Cited by 108Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Competency in Health Care

Culturally sensitive substance use treatment for racial/ethnic minority youth: A meta-analytic review

Steinka-Fry, Katarzyna T., Tanner-Smith, Emily E., Dakof, Gayle A., Henderson, Craig·2017·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized findings from studies examining culturally sensitive substance use treatment for racial/ethnic minority youth. An extensive literature search located eight eligible studies using experimental or quasi-experimental designs. The meta-analysis quantitatively synthesized findings comparing seven culturally sensitive treatment conditions to seven alternative conditions on samples composed of at least 90% racial/ethnic minority youth. The results from the meta-analysis indicated that culturally sensitive treatments were associated with significantly larger reductions in post-treatment substance use levels relative to their comparison conditions (g=0.37, 95% CI [0.12, 0.62], k=7, total number participants=723). The average time between pretest and posttest was 21weeks (SD=11.79). There was a statistically significant amount of heterogeneity across the seven studies (Q=26.5, p=0.00, τ 2 =0.08, I 2 =77.4%). Differential effects were not statistically significant when contrasts were active generic counterparts of treatment conditions (direct "bona fide" comparisons; g=-0.08, 95% CI [-0.51, 0.35]) and 'treatment as usual' conditions (g=0.39, 95% CI [-0.14, 0.91]). Strong conclusions from the review were hindered by the small number of available studies for synthesis, variability in comparison conditions across studies, and lack of diversity in the adolescent clients served in the studies. Nonetheless, this review suggests that cultura…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.006

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifications that focus on increasing the fit of the EBPs with the target population can lead to improved engagement, acceptability, and clinical outcomes, particularly when working with minority populations.

    “In fact, modifications that focus on increasing the fit of the EBPs with the target population can lead to improved engagement, acceptability, and clinical outcomes, particularly when working with minority populations [8–10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinka-Fry, K. T., Tanner-Smith, E. E., Dakof, G. A., & Henderson, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Sam Houston State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
75
Pages
22-37
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582681130
Cited by
108
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Institutes for Research (0373700101)
  • U.S. Department of Justice (2014-DC-BX-K001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
culturally sensitive care, addiction treatment, racial and ethnic minority youth, adolescents, treatment effectiveness, usual care, substance use disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Adolescent Health Services, Substance-Related Disorders, Cultural Competency, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review