Cited by 71Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Substance use, treatment, and demographic characteristics of pregnant women entering treatment for opioid use disorder differ by United States census region

Open access
Hand, Dennis J., Short, Vanessa L., Abatemarco, Diane J.·2017·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD) among pregnant women increased substantially between 1992 and 2012 across the United States, with the greatest increases occurring in the southern states. We analyzed the 2013 Treatment Episodes Database-Admissions to determine how substances used, characteristics of treatment, and demographics of pregnant women entering treatment for opioid use disorder vary between geographical regions. Analyses were restricted to cases where women reported being pregnant at the time of admission and reported opioids as the primary substance problem leading to the treatment admission. Characteristics were compared between U.S. census regions using Chi-square tests and logistic regression with the South census region as the reference group. Compared to the South, pregnant women admitted for OUD treatment in other regions were 33-79% less likely to use benzodiazepines, twice as likely to be admitted to medication assisted treatment (MAT), 2-3 times more likely to use heroin, and up to 1.5 times more likely to inject drugs. Fewer women in the South reported having medical insurance, education beyond high school, and being married. There is a need in the southern U.S. for policies and treatment programs to target reducing concomitant opioid and benzodiazepine use, increasing access to, and utilization of, MAT, and increasing access to medical insurance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.011

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hand, D. J., Short, V. L., & Abatemarco, D. J.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hand, Dennis J.
  • Short, Vanessa L.
  • Abatemarco, Diane J.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
76
Pages
58-63
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583175204
Cited by
71
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
opioid use disorder, pregnant women, maternal substance use, medication-assisted treatment, benzodiazepine use, heroin use, intravenous drug use, regional disparities, Southern United States, health insurance, demographic factors, treatment admissions
MeSH terms
Adult, Benzodiazepines, Female, Geography, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Southeastern United States, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Prevalence, Insurance Coverage, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review