Cited by 11Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Older marijuana users in substance abuse treatment: Treatment settings for marijuana-only versus polysubstance use admissions

Choi, Namkee G., DiNitto, Diana M.·2019·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Objective Growing numbers of older adult marijuana users make understanding the marijuana-related treatment needs and treatment-related characteristics of this age group increasingly important. In this study, we examined four types of marijuana-involved admissions (marijuana as the only substance; marijuana as the primary substance with other secondary/tertiary substances; marijuana as the secondary substance; and marijuana as the tertiary substance) by treatment setting.Methods Data came from the 2012-2017 Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions (TEDS-A), which includes 851,652 admissions by those aged 55+. Using multinomial logistic regression analysis, we focused on the 120,286 marijuana-involved admissions to test the hypothesis that polysubstance use would be associated with a higher likelihood of using detoxification and rehabilitation settings than ambulatory/outpatient settings.Results Of all marijuana-involved admissions, 7.5% were marijuana-only, 12.7% were marijuana-primary, 58.4% were marijuana-secondary, and 21.4% were marijuana-tertiary admissions. Compared to marijuana-only admissions, admissions involving other substances were associated with a higher likelihood of detoxification and rehabilitation than ambulatory/outpatient treatment (e.g., RRR = 5.79, 95% CI = 5.08-6.61 for detoxification and RRR = 3.19, 95% CI = 2.89-3.52 for rehabilitation among marijuana-tertiary admissions). Referral source, first age of marijuana use, race/ethnicity, and homelessness were significant covariates.Conclusions Given increasing numbers of older-adult marijuana users, healthcare providers should screen older adults for marijuana and other substance use, and substance abuse treatment programs should become more responsive to older adults' needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.07.016

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Choi, Namkee G.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
105
Pages
28-36
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963861257
Cited by
11
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
older adults, cannabis use, polydrug use, substance abuse treatment admissions, treatment setting, detoxification, rehabilitation, outpatient care, treatment needs, referral sources, homelessness, race and ethnicity
MeSH terms
Aged, Alcoholism, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders, Opiate Alkaloids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review