Cited by 90Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

Determination of protein structure at 8.5 Å resolution using cryo-electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging

Schur, Florian K.M., Hagen, Wim J.H., de Marco, Alex, Briggs, John A.G.·2013·Journal of Structural Biology

Abstract

Cryo-electron tomography combined with image processing by sub-tomogram averaging is unique in its power to resolve the structures of proteins and macromolecular complexes in situ. Limitations of the method, including the low signal to noise ratio within individual images from cryo-tomographic datasets and difficulties in determining the defocus at which the data was collected, mean that to date the very best structures obtained by sub-tomogram averaging are limited to a resolution of approximately 15 Å. Here, by optimizing data collection and defocus determination steps, we have determined the structure of assembled Mason-Pfizer monkey virus Gag protein using sub-tomogram averaging to a resolution of 8.5 Å. At this resolution alpha-helices can be directly and clearly visualized. These data demonstrate for the first time that high-resolution structural information can be obtained from cryo-electron tomograms using sub-tomogram averaging. Sub-tomogram averaging has the potential to allow detailed studies of unsolved and biologically relevant structures under biologically relevant conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent improvements in cryo-ET acquisition and data processing protocols allowed the structure of CA within native immature HIV-1 virus particles to be determined to subnanometer resolution.

    “Recent improvements in cryo-ET acquisition and data processing protocols [28] allowed the structure of CA within native immature HIV-1 virus particles to be determined to subnanometer resolution”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schur, F. K. M., Hagen, W. J. H., de Marco, A., & Briggs, J. A. G.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Briggs, John A.G.
Venue
Journal of Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
184
Issue
3
Pages
394-400
ISSN
1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027708667
Cited by
90
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BR 3635/2-1)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
subtomogram averaging, cryo-electron tomography, protein structure determination, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, Gag protein, macromolecular complexes, alpha-helix, data collection optimization, signal-to-noise ratio
MeSH terms
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Protein Conformation, Gene Products, gag, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, Electron Microscope Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review