The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The repeat structure of two paralogous genes, Yersinia ruckeri invasin (yrInv) and a “Y. ruckeri invasin-like molecule”, (yrIlm) sheds light on the evolution of adhesive capacities of a fish pathogen
Abstract
Inverse autotransporters comprise the recently identified type Ve secretion system and are exemplified by intimin from enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli and invasin from enteropathogenic Yersiniae. These proteins share a common domain architecture and promote bacterial adhesion to host cells. Here, we identified and characterized two putative inverse autotransporter genes in the fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri NVH_3758, namely yrInv (for Y. ruckeri invasin) and yrIlm (for Y. ruckeri invasin-like molecule). When trying to clone the highly repetitive genes for structural and functional studies, we experienced problems in obtaining PCR products. PCR failures and the highly repetitive nature of inverse autotransporters prompted us to sequence the genome of Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 using PacBio sequencing, which produces some of the longest average read lengths available in the industry at this moment. According to our sequencing data, YrIlm is composed of 2603 amino acids (7812bp) and has a molecular mass of 256.4kDa. Based on the new genome information, we performed PCR analysis on four non-sequenced Y. ruckeri strains as well as the sequenced. Y. ruckeri type strain. We found that the genes are variably present in the strains, and that the length of yrIlm, when present, also varies. In addition, the length of the gene product for all strains, including the type strain, was much longer than expected based on deposited sequences. The internal repeats of the yrInv gene product are hig…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Deposited genomes based on short-read methods show underestimated repeat numbers (by a factor of 4 to 5).”
From Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
In the citing paper
“As an example, Wrobel et al. (81) have shown that in the fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri, a surface adhesin involved in biofilm formation called Ilm has >20 Ig-like domains repeated in tandem that are identical even on the DNA level (repeat length ∼300 bp).”
From Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
In the citing paper
“Repeat numbers vary slightly from strain to strain, but in this case only PacBio-based genomes show the correct number of repeats (Figure 1).”
From Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
In the citing paper
“Repeat numbers vary slightly from strain to strain, but in this case only PacBio-based genomes show the correct number of repeats (Figure 1).”
From Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cites
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., et al. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 · Cited by 20,027
Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega
Sievers, F., Wilm, A., Dineen, D., Gibson, T. J., Karplus, K., Li, W., Lopez, R., McWilliam, H., Remmert, M., Söding, J., et al. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75 · Cited by 15,355
The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology
Aziz, R. K., Bartels, D., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Disz, T. L., Edwards, R. A., Formsma, K., Gerdes, S., Glass, E. M., Kubal, M., et al. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 · Cited by 11,996
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction
Söding, J., Biegert, A., & Lupas, A. N. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki408 · Cited by 3,879
progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement
Darling, A. E., Mau, B., & Perna, N. T. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 · Cited by 3,848
Bertani, G. (1951) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.62.3.293-300.1951 · Cited by 3,232
InterProScan: protein domains identifier
Quévillon, E., Silventoinen, V., Pillai, S., Harte, N., Mulder, N., Apweiler, R., & López, R. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki442 · Cited by 2,976
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bernstein, 2014, NIH Public Access, 4, 1
- Busch, 1978, Enteric red mouth disease, Mar. Fish. Rev., 40, 42
- Kearse, 2012, Geneious, Bioinformatics
Cited by
Tørresen, O. K., Star, B., Mier, P., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., Bateman, A., Jarnot, P., Gruca, A., Grynberg, M., Kajava, A. V., Promponas, V. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz841 · Cited by 347
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wrobel, A., Ottoni, C., Leo, J. C., Gulla, S., & Linke, D.
- ORCID
- Linke, Dirk
- Venue
- Journal of Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-183
- ISSN
- 1047-8477
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 79
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
