Cited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Building alternative splicing and evolution-aware sequence-structure maps for protein repeats

Open access
Szatkownik, Antoine, Zea, Diego Javier, Richard, Hugues, Laine, Elodie·2023·Journal of Structural Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Alternative splicing of repeats in proteins provides a mechanism for rewiring and fine-tuning protein interaction networks. In this work, we developed a robust and versatile method, ASPRING, to identify alternatively spliced protein repeats from gene annotations. ASPRING leverages evolutionary meaningful alternative splicing-aware hierarchical graphs to provide maps between protein repeats sequences and 3D structures. We re-think the definition of repeats by explicitly accounting for transcript diversity across several genes/species. Using a stringent sequence-based similarity criterion, we detected over 5,000 evolutionary conserved repeats by screening virtually all human protein-coding genes and their orthologs across a dozen species. Through a joint analysis of their sequences and structures, we extracted specificity-determining sequence signatures and assessed their implication in experimentally resolved and modelled protein interactions. Our findings demonstrate the widespread alternative usage of protein repeats in modulating protein interactions and open avenues for targeting repeat-mediated interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsb.2023.107997

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Szatkownik, A., Zea, D. J., Richard, H., & Laine, E.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Richard, Hugues
Venue
Journal of Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
215
Issue
3
Pages
107997
ISSN
1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384157087
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Biology (acceptedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication server of the Robert Koch Institute (Robert Kock Institute) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-20-CE45-0010, ANR-17-CE12-0009, ANR-17)
  • Université Paris-Saclay
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
alternative splicing, protein repeats, protein isoforms, AlphaFold models, protein-protein interaction, intrinsically disordered regions, sequence signatures, orthologs, protein-protein interaction network
MeSH terms
Humans, Proteins, Alternative Splicing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review