Cited by 401Estrogen and related hormone effectsBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Aromatase, aromatase inhibitors, and breast cancer

Open access
Chumsri, Saranya, Howes, Timothy, Bao, Ting, Sabnis, Gauri, Brodie, Angela·2011·The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Estrogens are known to be important in the growth of breast cancers in both pre and postmenopausal women. As the number of breast cancer patients increases with age, the majority of breast cancer patients are postmenopausal women. Although estrogens are no longer made in the ovaries after menopause, peripheral tissues produce sufficient concentrations to stimulate tumor growth. As aromatase catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of estrogen, inhibitors of this enzyme are effective targeted therapy for breast cancer. Three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now FDA approved and have been shown to be more effective than the antiestrogen tamoxifen and are well tolerated. AIs are now a standard treatment for postmenopausal patients. AIs are effective in adjuvant and first-line metastatic setting. This review describes the development of AIs and their current use in breast cancer. Recent research focuses on elucidating mechanisms of acquired resistance that may develop in some patients with long term AI treatment and also in innate resistance. Preclinical data in resistance models demonstrated that the crosstalk between ER and other signaling pathways particularly MAPK and PI3K/Akt is an important resistant mechanism. Blockade of these other signaling pathways is an attractive strategy to circumvent the resistance to AI therapy in breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of these novel targeted therapies to reverse resistance to AIs. Article from the special issue on 'Targeted Inhibitors'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.02.001

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proof-of-concept for inhibition of intracrine pathways has been established by aromatase inhibition in breast cancer and 5α-reductase inhibition in prostate hyperplasia.

    “The proof-of-concept has been established by aromatase inhibition in breast cancer and 5α-reductase inhibition in prostate hyperplasia (Chumsri et al., 2011, Lowe et al., 2003, McConnell et al., 1998).”

    From Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited (2018) · cites this paper as Chumsri et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [35]Santen RJ Brodie H Simpson ER Siiteri PK Brodie A History of aromatase: saga of an important biological mediator and therapeutic target Endocr Rev 2009 30 4 343 375 19389994
  2. [88]Sabnis G Gediya L Njar V Brodie A HDAC inhibitors sensitize ER negative breast cancer cells to AIs, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2007 30th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium San Antonio, TX Abstract # 2096
  3. [108]Lipton A Ali S Leitzel K HER-2 protein expression predicts response to trastuzumab in FISH-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer 2008 31st AACR-CTRC San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium San Antonio, TX

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chumsri, S., Howes, T., Bao, T., Sabnis, G., & Brodie, A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Brodie, Angela
Venue
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
125
Issue
1-2
Pages
13-22
ISSN
0960-0760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085921275
Cited by
401
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA062483)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
aromatase inhibitors, aromatase, breast cancer, tamoxifen, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, acquired drug resistance, non-specific immunity, MAPK signaling, PI3K/Akt signaling, estrogen synthesis, postmenopausal women, adjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, metastatic breast cancer, growth factor receptor inhibitors
MeSH terms
Trastuzumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Aromatase, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Receptors, Estrogen, Signal Transduction, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Aromatase Inhibitors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review