The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework
Open accessAbstract
Despite the burgeoning number of studies of public sector information systems, very few scholars have focussed on the relationship between e-Government policies and information systems choice and design. Drawing on Fountain's (2001) technology enactment framework, this paper endeavours to conduct an in-depth investigation of the intricacies characterising the choice and design of new technologies in the context of e-Government reforms. By claiming that technologies are carriers of e-Government reform aims, this study investigates the logics embedded in the design of new technology and extant political interests and values inscribed in e-Government policies. The e-Government enactment framework is proposed as a theoretical and analytical approach to understand and study the complexity of these relationships which shape e-Government policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS
HOOD, C. (1991) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x · Cited by 10,159
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Dunleavy, P. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057 · Cited by 2,638 · cited 2×
“…sector has been mainly discussed as a tool to help create new and better service delivery (Bekkers and Zouridis, 1999) by increasing efficiency and transparency, and improving accountability in public administration procedures and management (Dunleavy et al., 2005; Gupta et al., 2008; Heeks, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodBarley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001 · Cited by 637
Cited by
A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004 · Cited by 543
Self-citationGil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-150354 · Cited by 493
Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0
Nam, T. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005 · Cited by 368
Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487 · Cited by 301
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cordella, A., & Iannacci, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-66
- ISSN
- 0963-8687 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020346392
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 105.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001
- The paper
- Cordella, A., & Iannacci, F. (2010). Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
