The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Written feedback is the most well-known means teachers use to interact and communicate with learners.
“Consequently, written feedback is the most well-known means teachers use to interact and communicate with learners (Ferris, 2004;Hyland & Hyland, 2001).”
From A comparative study of the effect of teacher’s group and individual feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ learning of speech acts in apology letter writing (2020) · cites this paper as Ferris, 2004
Cites
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,259 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Error correction, revision, and learning
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges
Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190510000115 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement One Another in Myanmar EFL Students’ Writing
Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Ciampa, K., & Wolfe, Z. M. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1822313 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., & Mohebbi, H. (2019) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-019-0084-9 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Rouhi, A., Dibah, M., & Mohebbi, H. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00093-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Pourmousavi, Z., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00088-w · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferris, D. R.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Sacramento (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferris, Dana R.
- ORCID
- Ferris, Dana R.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-62
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160994700
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 77.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- error correction, grammatical error correction, second language writing, teacher feedback, writing instruction, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
