Cited by 414EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Error correction, revision, and learning

Truscott, John, Hsu, Angela Yi-ping·2008·Journal of Second Language Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feedback on L2 writing does not always fulfill its potential.

    “Equally however, research reminds us that it does not always fulfill this potential (e.g.Ferris, 2006;Truscott & Hsu, 2008)”

    From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Truscott & Hsu, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P.
Affiliations
National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Corresponding author
Truscott, John
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
292-305
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068495385
Cited by
414
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
FWCI
145.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Tsing Hua University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
error correction, corrective feedback, revision, second language writing, learning to write, short-term learning, error reduction, narrative writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review