The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648
Cited by
Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts
Lee, I. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9 · Cited by 386
Self-citationWaller, L., & Papi, M. (2017) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004 · Cited by 189
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175
The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback
Lin, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103529 · Cited by 86
How Does that Make You Feel: Students’ Affective Engagement with Feedback
Ene, E., & Yao, J. (. (2021) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.04 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-312
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991111060
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001
- The paper
- Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
