Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Z. (., & Hyland, K. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Making judgements: investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback
McConlogue, T. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.868878 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Engaging with multiple sources of feedback in academic writing: postgraduate students’ perspectives
Xu, L., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2161089 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Schiller, R., Fleckenstein, J., Mertens, U., Horbach, A., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105163 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Huang, J., & Teng, M. F. (2025) · Digital Applied Linguistics · doi:10.29140/dal.v2.102469 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Affective engagement is interconnected with cognitive and behavioral engagement, forming a complex, nonlinear relationship (Fan & Xu, 2020; Cheng & Liu, 2022).”
Luo, L., & Yusuf, A. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2548919 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fan, Y., & Xu, J.
- Affiliations
- Central China Normal University (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Jinfen
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 100775
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3109535435
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 67.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (19YJA740011)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer feedback, student engagement, second language writing, EFL writing, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
