Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How do schools support students after a behavioral threat assessment?

Maeng, Jennifer L., Cowley, Deanne, Cornell, Dewey G., Huang, Francis·2026·Journal of School Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101571
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101571

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Allen, 2008, Response of school personnel to student threat assessment training, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 319, 10.1080/09243450802332184 · DOI
  2. Austin, 2017, Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 36, 3257, 10.1002/sim.7336 · DOI
  3. Bates, 2015, Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Briesch, 2020, A review of state-level procedural guidance for implementing multitiered systems of support for behavior (MTSS-B), Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22, 131, 10.1177/1098300719884707 · DOI
  5. Casseus, 2024, Racial and ethnic disparities in unmet need for mental health care among children: A nationally representative study, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 11, 3489, 10.1007/s40615-023-01801-4 · DOI
  6. Cornell, 2011, Reductions in long-term suspensions following adoption of the Virginia student threat assessment guidelines, NASSP Bulletin, 95, 175, 10.1177/0192636511415255 · DOI
  7. Cornell, 2025, Referral rates for school threat assessment, Psychology in the Schools, 62, 1294, 10.1002/pits.23399 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cornell, 2025, Behavioral threat assessment and equity in exclusionary school discipline, School Psychology Review, 55, 241, 10.1080/2372966X.2025.2457006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cornell, 2025, Equity in law enforcement actions following a school threat assessment, Law and Human Behavior, 49, 338, 10.1037/lhb0000602 · DOI
  10. Cornell, 2018, Student threat assessment as a standard school safety practice: Results from a statewide implementation study, School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 213, 10.1037/spq0000220 · DOI
  11. Crepeau-Hobson, 2022, Disciplinary and nondisciplinary outcomes of school-based threat assessment in Colorado schools, School Psychology Review, 51, 609, 10.1080/2372966X.2020.1842716 · DOI
  12. Cruz, 2021, A quantcrit analysis of context, discipline, special education, and disproportionality, AERA Open, 7, 10.1177/23328584211041354 · DOI
  13. Ellington, 2023, Elevating and expanding school counselors’ roles and voices in the prevention of school violence, Professional School Counseling, 27, 1, 10.1177/2156759X221150003 · DOI
  14. Enders, 2007, Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue, Psychological Methods, 12, 121, 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gregory, 2025, Restorative justice conferences in elementary and secondary schools, Journal of School Violence, 24, 298, 10.1080/15388220.2025.2471437 · DOI
  16. Huang, 2021, Teacher support for zero tolerance is associated with higher suspension rates and lower feelings of safety, School Psychology Review, 50, 288
  17. Jackson, 2024, Preventing school violence: A review of school threat assessment models, Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 11, 48, 10.1037/tam0000204 · DOI
  18. Jackson, 2024, Preventing school violence: A survey of school threat assessment practices, perceived impact, and challenges, Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 11, 1, 10.1037/tam0000187 · DOI
  19. Johnson, 2023, Zero tolerance policy analysis: A look at 30 years of school-based ZT policies in practice in the United States of America, Cogent Education, 10, 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2179863 · DOI
  20. Kaplan, 2005, Threats of violence by students in special education, Behavioral Disorders, 31, 107, 10.1177/019874290503100102 · DOI
  21. Limber, 2011, Development, evaluation, and future directions of the Olweus bullying prevention program, Journal of School Violence, 10, 71, 10.1080/15388220.2010.519375 · DOI
  22. Madfis, 2024, School threat assessment team recommendations: Surveillance versus social support and racial/ethnic equity, School Psychology Review, 1
  23. Maeng, 2020, Student threat assessment as an alternative to exclusionary discipline, Journal of School Violence, 19, 377, 10.1080/15388220.2019.1707682 · DOI
  24. Maeng, 2023, Threat assessment and disparities in school discipline, Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 11, 186, 10.1037/tam0000213 · DOI
  25. Mahoney, 2021, Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students, American Psychologist, 76, 1128, 10.1037/amp0000701 · DOI
  26. Nekvasil, 2012, Student reports of peer threats of violence: Prevalence and outcomes, Journal of School Violence, 11, 357, 10.1080/15388220.2012.706764 · DOI
  27. Pasyk, 2025, Challenges of school mental health personnel in implementing threat assessments in schools, Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 12, 64, 10.1037/tam0000225 · DOI
  28. Rao, 1981, The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: Chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 221, 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477633 · DOI
  29. Stohlman, 2020, Evaluation of threat assessment training for school personnel, Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 7, 29, 10.1037/tam0000142 · DOI
  30. Vetter, 2024, A statewide multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) approach to social and emotional learning (SEL) and mental health, Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy, 3
  31. Waschbusch, 2019, School-based interventions for aggression and defiance in youth: A framework for evidence-based practice, School Mental Health, 11, 92, 10.1007/s12310-018-9269-0 · DOI
  32. Williams, 2023, Barriers to school-based mental health resource utilization among black adolescent males, Journal of Clinical Social Work, 51, 246, 10.1007/s10615-023-00866-2 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Maeng, J. L., Cowley, D., Cornell, D. G., & Huang, F.
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-06
Volume
116
Pages
101571
ISSN
0022-4405
DOI
10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101571
Cited by
0
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Office of Justice Programs
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • National Institute of Justice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do schools support students after a behavioral threat assessment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101571
The paper
Maeng, J. L., Cowley, D., Cornell, D. G., & Huang, F. (2026). How do schools support students after a behavioral threat assessment? Journal of School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.