Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Referral Rates for School Threat Assessment

Cornell, Dewey G., Kerere, Jordan, Konold, Timothy, Maeng, Jennifer, Afolabi, Kelvin, Huang, Francis, Cowley, Deanne·2025·Psychology in the Schools

Abstract

Although behavioral threat assessment and management (often shortened to “threat assessment”) has become widely used in US schools, no studies have systematically examined how frequently schools conduct threat assessments and how threat assessment rates vary as a function of student and school demographics. Of particular concern is that students with disabilities receive threat assessments at disproportionately high rates. This study examined the 1‐year frequency of threat assessments in a statewide sample of 611 elementary, 341 middle, and 269 high schools reporting 15,301 threat assessments, of which 41% concerned students with disabilities. We identified threat assessment rate differences associated with student grade, gender, race/ethnicity, and disability status. We further examined the association between threat assessment rates and school‐level demographic characteristics including racial/ethnic composition, prevalence of economically disadvantaged students, and proportion of students with a disability. To place these results in context, we compared findings for threat assessment with out‐of‐school suspension rates. We discuss reasons why students with disabilities might be referred for BTAM at a high rate and recommend practices for assuring their educational rights and needs are safeguarded. Evolving school threat assessment policies should recognize the practice demands placed on school staff to evaluate a substantial number of students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pits.23399

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.3102/0013189X09357620 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/tam0000092 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/15388220.2019.1694031 · DOI
  4. Cameron K., 2018, Violent Threat Risk Assessment (VTRA) Protocol: A Community Based Approach
  5. Cornell D., 2018, Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines
  6. Cornell D., 2015, Closing the School Discipline Gap: Research for Policymakers, 180
  7. Cornell D., 2020, Student Threat Assessment as a Safe and Supportive Prevention Strategy: Final Technical Report
  8. Cornell D., 2024, School Threat Assessment Toolkit
  9. 10.17105/SPR-2017-0030.V47-2 · DOI
  10. Cornell D. J.Maeng S.Winter et al. Forthcoming. "Behavioral Threat Assessment and Equity in Exclusionary School Discipline."School Psychology Review.https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2025.2457006. · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1037/spq0000220 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/a0016182 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0192636511415255 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086266 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/2372966X.2020.1842716 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/tam0000163 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/23328584211041354 · DOI
  18. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency & U.S. Secret Service, 2023, Improving School Safety Through Bystander Reporting: A Toolkit for Strengthening
  19. Fabelo T., 2011, Breaking School Rules: A Statewide Study of How School Discipline Relates to Students’ Success and Juvenile Justice Involvement
  20. 10.1177/019874291203700303 · DOI
  21. Florida Department of Education [FLDOE], 2022, Student Discipline Data by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, State and District Levels, 2021‐2022, Final Survey 5
  22. 10.1007/s10826-019-01407-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/pits.21838 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/15388220.2012.682010 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/2372966x.2020.1832865 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/tam0000204 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/2331186x.2023.2179863 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/01987429050310010 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1098300708329710 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/cdev.12690 · DOI
  31. Maeng J., 2024, Statewide Implementation of School Threat Assessment in Florida: Final Technical Report
  32. Maeng J. D.Cornell J.Kerere F.Huang T.Konold andK.Afolabi.2023.School Threat Assessment in Florida: Technical Report of 2021‐2022 Case Data. Charlottesville VA: School of Education and Human Development University of Virginia.https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31694.23369. · DOI
  33. Maeng J. D.Cowley D.Cornell andF.Huang.2024. How Do Schools Support Students After a Threat Assessment? Manuscript under review. · DOI
  34. 10.1080/15388220.2019.1707682 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/med-psych/9780190940164.001.0001 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/1090198121107374 · DOI
  37. Morgan E., 2014, The School Discipline Consensus Report: Strategies From the Field to Keep Students Engaged in School and Out of the Juvenile Justice System
  38. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2010, Numbers and Types of Public Elementary and Secondary Schools From the Common Core of Data: School Year 2009‐10
  39. National Threat Assessment Center, 2018, Enhancing School Safety Using a Threat Assessment Model: An Operational Guide for Preventing Targeted School Violence
  40. 10.1037/tam0000038 · DOI
  41. O'Toole M. E., 2000, The School Shooter: A Threat Assessment Perspective
  42. 10.1177/0044118X14528958 · DOI
  43. 10.1177/0741932519825 · DOI
  44. 10.3102/0034654318791582 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cornell, D. G., Kerere, J., Konold, T., Maeng, J., Afolabi, K., Huang, F., & Cowley, D.
Affiliations
  • School of Education and Human Development University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
  • College of Education and Human Development University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
Venue
Psychology in the Schools
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01-27
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
1294-1305
ISSN
  • 0033-3085
  • 1520-6807
Cited by
9
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Referral Rates for School Threat Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pits.23399
The paper
Cornell, D. G., Kerere, J., Konold, T., Maeng, J., Afolabi, K., Huang, F., & Cowley, D. (2025). Referral Rates for School Threat Assessment. Psychology in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23399

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.