Accuracy of tablet splitting: Comparison study between hand splitting and tablet cutter
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Tablet splitting is often used in pharmacy practice to adjust the administered doses. It is also used as a method of reducing medication costs. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of tablet splitting by comparing hand splitting vs. a tablet cutter for a low dose drug tablet. METHODS: Salbutamol tablets (4 mg) were chosen as low dose tablets. A randomly selected equal number of tablets were split by hand and a tablet cutter, and the remaining tablets were kept whole. Weight variation and drug content were analysed for salbutamol in 0.1 N HCl using a validated spectrophotometric method. The percentages by which each whole tablet's or half-tablet's drug content and weight difference from sample mean values were compared with USP specification ranges for drug content. The %RSD was also calculated in order to determine whether the drugs met USP specification for %RSD. The tablets and half tablets were scanned using electron microscopy to show any visual differences arising from splitting. RESULTS: 27.5% of samples differed from sample mean values by a percentage that fell outside of USP specification for weight, of which 15% from the tablet cutter and 25% from those split by hand fell outside the specifications. All whole tablets and half tablets met the USP specifications for drug content but the variation of content between the two halves reached 21.3% of total content in case of hand splitting, and 7.13% only for the tablet cutter. The %RSDs for drug content and weight met the USP specification for whole salbutamol tablets and the half tablets which were split by tablet cutter. The halves which were split by hand fell outside the specification for %RSD (drug content = 6.43%, weight = 8.33%). The differences were visually clear in the electron microscope scans. CONCLUSION: Drug content variation in half-tablets appeared to be attributable to weight variation occurring during the splitting process. This could have serious clinical consequences for medications with a narrow therapeutic-toxic range. On the basis of our results, we recommend to avoid tablet splitting whenever possible or the use of an accurate tablet splitting device when splitting cannot be avoided.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research suggested that tablet-splitting processes caused drug and content variation.
“Prior research suggested that tablet-splitting processes caused drug and content variation, 21”
From Does splitting a tablet obtain an accurate dose? A systematic review and meta‐ analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does splitting a tablet obtain an accurate dose? A systematic review and meta‐ analysis
Chaudhri, K., Kearney, M., Di Tanna, G. L., Gnanenthiran, S. R., Day, R. O., Rodgers, A., & Atkins, E. R. (2022) · Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research · doi:10.1002/jppr.1843 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Jager, L., Koopmans, P., Westra, N., Nijland, M., Hooge, M. L.-D., & Munnink, T. O. (2026) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/10781552261478573
- Authors
- Habib, W. A., Alanizi, A. S., Abdelhamid, M. M., & Alanizi, F. K.
- Affiliations
- King Saud University (SA)
- King Fahd Medical City (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Habib, Walid A.
- Venue
- Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 454-459
- ISSN
- 1319-0164 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4246398
- OpenAlex
- W1986673622
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- tablet splitting, salbutamol, low-dose tablets, weight variation, USP specifications, pharmaceutical compounding, drug cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review