Cited by 0Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practices

Ibrutinib tablet splitting as a practical strategy for dose reduction in the management of drug–drug interactions

Open access
Jager, Liene, Koopmans, Pauline, Westra, Niels, Nijland, Marcel, Hooge, Marjolijn Lub-de, Munnink, Thijs Oude·2026·Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice

Abstract

Background: Ibrutinib exposure is strongly affected by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) activity. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can substantially increase ibrutinib plasma concentrations, requiring major dose reductions in DDI management. This study aimed to assess whether splitting ibrutinib 140 mg tablets is a practical and feasible strategy to adjust ibrutinib dosing in case of DDIs. Methods: Ibrutinib 140 mg tablets were split into quarters using a tablet splitter aiming at 35 mg dose units. The obtained quarters were evaluated according to the European Pharmacopoeia requirements for Uniformity of Dosage Units. In addition, Uniformity of Mass, Uniformity of Content, loss of mass, stability of quartered tablets, reproducibility of splitting, usability of the splitting device, and patient instructions were assessed. The expected effects of tablet splitting on ibrutinib exposure were calculated. Results: A strong correlation between tablet mass and ibrutinib content was observed ( r = 0.896; p < 0.0001), indicating uniform distribution of ibrutinib throughout the tablets. Loss of mass was <3% for all tablets, indicating that quartering did not lead to substantial material loss. The mean ibrutinib content was 34.4 mg (range 28.2–40.3 mg). Uniformity of Dosage Units of ibrutinib quarters complied with the European Pharmacopoeia requirements, with an acceptance value of 7.5% against a requirement of ≤15%. Split tablets were stable for at least two weeks under outpatient storage conditions. Patient instructions were considered sufficient and the splitting device was rated user-friendly. The impact of splitting variation on exposure is within the range of interindividual variation in ibrutinib exposure. Conclusion: Splitting ibrutinib 140 mg tablets may provide a practical, clinically feasible and patient-friendly strategy to obtain 35 or 70 mg doses of ibrutinib when dose reduction is required in the management of DDIs. The expected exposure variation due to dose variations introduced by tablet splitting is unlikely to be of clinical relevance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10781552261478573

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Clinical Pharmacology and biopharmaceutics review(s): Pharmacometric Review. Application number 205552Orig2s000. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2014. Available from: FDA pharmacometric review (ibrutinib).
  2. Council of Europe. European pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 11th Edition - Monograph Tablets. 2023.
  3. Council of Europe. European pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 11th Edition - Monograph Uniformity of mass. Published online April 2023.
  4. Council of Europe. European pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 11th Edition - Monograph Uniformity of content. Published online April 2023.
  5. Council of Europe. European pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 11th Edition - Monograph Uniformity of Dosage Units. 2023.
  6. Seong S, Shin JY, Kim D, et al. The effect of tablet splitting on the mass loss, uniformity, and stability: by hand or splitter? Journal of Asian Association of Schools of Pharmacy 2019; 8: 7–14.
  7. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041149 · DOI

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Jager, L., Koopmans, P., Westra, N., Nijland, M., Hooge, M. L.-D., & Munnink, T. O.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University Medical Centre Groningen
Venue
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-08-20
Pages
10781552261478573-10781552261478573
ISSN
  • 1078-1552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-092X
OpenAlex
W7203829155
Cited by
0
References
21
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
ibrutinib, tablet splitting, drug-drug interactions, dose reduction, CYP3A4, uniformity of dosage units, tablet stability, patient instructions, BTK inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review