Cited by 4Occupational Health and Safety ResearchOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesOccupational Health and Safety Management

The occupational safety implications of the California residential rooftop solar photovoltaic systems mandate

Open access
Gernand, Jeremy M.·2022·Journal of Safety Research

Abstract

Introduction A 2018 change to the California building code mandates that new residential construction in the state include rooftop solar photovoltaic power systems beginning in 2020. As residential construction (especially work on rooftops) is among the more dangerous occupations in the United States, this paper seeks to quantify the increased risks to workers as a result of this mandate. Method An analysis of the trends by occupation of nonfatal safety incident rates in the United States combined with a Monte Carlo simulation provide an estimate of the uncertain impact of this new mandate. Results Recordable safety incidents are anticipated to increase by a total of 16.6 incidents (standard deviation = 1.0 incidents) over the 2020-2029 time period as a result of this policy change. However, lessons from Germany and other industries offer potential avenues to reduce the negative social impact of this mandate. Conclusions While it is not possible to increase employment in any sector without increasing the expected number of occupational injuries to some degree, these results indicate that risks could be considerably reduced by making solar PV system design decisions that increase worker productivity and reduce roof exposure time. Practical applications Changes such as eliminating work on roofs could decrease the expected number of recordable injuries over the 10-year period by 0.30 incidents per year (a reduction of 18%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gernand, J. M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gernand, Jeremy M.
Venue
Journal of Safety Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
82
Pages
144-150
ISSN
0022-4375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280595862
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Safety Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
Keywords
rooftop solar photovoltaic systems, occupational safety, labor productivity, Monte Carlo simulation
MeSH terms
California, Germany, Humans, Occupations, United States, Occupational Health, Occupational Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review