The occupational safety implications of the California residential rooftop solar photovoltaic systems mandate
Open accessAbstract
Introduction A 2018 change to the California building code mandates that new residential construction in the state include rooftop solar photovoltaic power systems beginning in 2020. As residential construction (especially work on rooftops) is among the more dangerous occupations in the United States, this paper seeks to quantify the increased risks to workers as a result of this mandate. Method An analysis of the trends by occupation of nonfatal safety incident rates in the United States combined with a Monte Carlo simulation provide an estimate of the uncertain impact of this new mandate. Results Recordable safety incidents are anticipated to increase by a total of 16.6 incidents (standard deviation = 1.0 incidents) over the 2020-2029 time period as a result of this policy change. However, lessons from Germany and other industries offer potential avenues to reduce the negative social impact of this mandate. Conclusions While it is not possible to increase employment in any sector without increasing the expected number of occupational injuries to some degree, these results indicate that risks could be considerably reduced by making solar PV system design decisions that increase worker productivity and reduce roof exposure time. Practical applications Changes such as eliminating work on roofs could decrease the expected number of recordable injuries over the 10-year period by 0.30 incidents per year (a reduction of 18%).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite various safety initiatives, the use of protective devices remained low.
“Furthermore, like other studies, despite various safety initiatives, the use of protective devices remained low, highlighting an area for improvement (Zhao et al. 2023; Kong et al. 2022; Sanchez et al. 2022; Mennel et al. 2021).”
From Impact of risk mitigation strategies on non-fatal injuries in the construction sector in qatar: a retrospective analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Sanchez et al. 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soubra, L., Al-Mohannadi, A., Berzan, Y., Consunji, R., El‑Menyar, A., Al‑Thani, H., Al-Marri, M. A., & Al-Hajri, H. S. (2025) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-025-02126-x · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gernand, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gernand, Jeremy M.
- ORCID
- Gernand, Jeremy M.
- Venue
- Journal of Safety Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 144-150
- ISSN
- 0022-4375 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280595862
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Safety Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
- Keywords
- rooftop solar photovoltaic systems, occupational safety, labor productivity, Monte Carlo simulation
- MeSH terms
- California, Germany, Humans, Occupations, United States, Occupational Health, Occupational Injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review