Cited by 202Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSoftware Engineering Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective

Open access

Coleman, Gerry, O’Connor, Rory·2008·Journal of Systems and Software

DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.027

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.027

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Untitled work
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,855
THE HUMAN SIDE OF ENTERPRISE
McGregor, D. (1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-054752-4.50008-7 · Cited by 4,861
MEDIA REVIEWS
Gosby, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-7-01210.x · Cited by 2,001
CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249774 · Cited by 1,512
Grounded Theory and Organizational Research
Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638602200207 · Cited by 1,284
Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers
Goulding, C. (2002) · Cited by 925
Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model
Herbsleb, J. D., Zubrow, D., Goldenson, D. R., Hayes, W., & Paulk, M. C. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/255656.255692 · Cited by 417

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Bach, J., 1994. The immaturity of CMM. In: American Programmer, vol. 7(9), pp. 13–18.
Fitzgibbon, C., 1996. ISO 9001 registration: lessons learned by Canadian Software Companies. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Technology, Florida, pp. 193–201.
New Oxford Thesaurus of English, 2001. Oxford University Press.
Sliger, M., 2004. Fooling around with XP: why i lost interest in PMI and took up with something more extreme. In: Better Software, May/June, pp. 16–18.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 202

Business Success in Software SMEs: Recommendations for Future SPI Studies
Clarke, P. M., & O’Connor, R. V. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_1 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Keeping the Development Environment Up to Date—A Study of the Situated Practices of Appropriating the Eclipse IDE
Draxler, S., Stevens, G., & Boden, A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2014.2354047 · Cited by 9
An Objective Compliance Analysis of Project Management Process in Main Agile Methodologies with the ISO/IEC 29110 Entry Profile
Galván-Cruz, S., Mora, M., O’Connor, R. V., Acosta, F., & Rodríguez, F. J. Á. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach · doi:10.4018/ijitsa.2017010105 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
"More like a poem than a play" : towards a dramaturgy of performing arts for Early Years
Fletcher-Watson, B. (2016) · St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) · Cited by 9
Harmonizing the Quality View of Stakeholders
Shekhovtsov, V. A., Mayr, H. C., & Kop, C. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417009-4.00003-x · Cited by 8
Reconciliation of scrum and the project management process of the ISO/IEC 29110 standard-Entry profile—an experimental evaluation through usability measures
Galván-Cruz, S., Mora, M., Laporte, C. Y., & Duran-Limon, H. A. (2021) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-021-09552-3 · Cited by 9
Improving ISD Agility in Fast-Moving Software Organizations
Persson, J. S., Jacob Nørbjerg, B., & Nielsen, P. A. (2016) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · Cited by 8
A Requirements Engineering Framework for Software Startup Companies
Parthasarathy, S., & Daneva, M. (2021) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2021070104 · Cited by 7
Exploring the Belief Systems of Software Development Professionals
O’Connor, R. V., & Yılmaz, M. (2015) · Cybernetics & Systems · doi:10.1080/01969722.2015.1038483 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Applying grounded theory to understand software process improvement implementation: a study of Brazilian software organizations
Montoni, M. A., & Rocha, A. R. (2013) · Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11334-013-0209-8 · Cited by 7
Uma Investigação sobre os Fatores Críticos de Sucesso em Iniciativas de Melhoria de Processos de Software
Montoni, M. A., & Rocha, A. R. (2011) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS) · doi:10.5753/sbqs.2011.15393 · Cited by 7
A Perspective-Based Model of Quality for Software Engineering Processes
Kroeger, T. A., & Davidson, N. (2009) · Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC) · doi:10.1109/aswec.2009.40 · Cited by 7
Factors Influencing the Adoption of ISO/IEC 29110 in Thai Government Projects
Siddoo, V., & Wongsai, N. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach · doi:10.4018/ijitsa.2017010102 · Cited by 6
Using Grounded Theory to Acquire Knowledge About Critical Success Factors for Conducting Software Process Improvement Implementation Initiatives
Montoni, M. A., & Rocha, A. R. (2011) · International Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.4018/jkm.2011070104 · Cited by 6
Discovering automation level of software change request process from qualitative empirical data
Stojanov, Ž. (2011) · IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI) · doi:10.1109/saci.2011.5872972 · Cited by 6
Knowledge Engineering for Software Development Life Cycles
Ramachandran, M. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-509-4 · Cited by 6
SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT: AWARENESS, USE, AND BENEFITS IN CANADIAN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FIRMS
Chevers, D. A. (2017) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-759020170206 · Cited by 6
Process modelling, delegation and control in global software development
Tiako, P. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology · doi:10.1504/ijcat.2011.039137 · Cited by 5
Software Process Improvement Assessment for Cloud Application Based on Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method
Dalal, S., Agrawal, A., Dahiya, N., & Verma, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_70 · Cited by 5
XP in a Small Software Development Business: Adapting to Local Constraints
Babb, J. S., Hoda, R., & Jacob Nørbjerg, B. (2014) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09546-2_2 · Cited by 5
From pragmatic to systematic software process improvement: an evaluated approach
Kuhrmann, M., & Fernández, D. M. (2015) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2014.0190 · Cited by 5
Software Process Lines
Niazi, M., & Zahran, S. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1945-6.ch107 · Cited by 5
Methodology for ISO/IEC 29110 Profile Implementation in EPF Composer
Buchalcevová, A. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach · doi:10.4018/ijitsa.2017010104 · Cited by 5
Towards the identification of the influence of SPI on the successful evolution of software SMEs
Clarke, P. M., & O’Connor, R. V. (2010) · University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) · doi:10.34961/5399 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Dynamic Capabilities and Project Management in Small Software Firms
Jacob Nørbjerg, B., Nielsen, P. A., & Persson, J. S. (2017) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.655 · Cited by 4
Programas de Melhoria de Processo de Software – Uma pesquisa sobre a influência dos aspectos humanos
dos Santos, D. V., Vilela, D. C., de Souza, C. R. B., & Conte, T. U. (2011) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS) · doi:10.5753/sbqs.2011.15395 · Cited by 4
Exploring Managerial Commitment towards SPI in Small and Very Small Enterprises
O’Connor, R. V., Basri, S. B., & Coleman, G. (2010) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15666-3_24 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Deploying Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities: An Early Stage Industry View
O’Connor, R. V., & Laporte, C. Y. (2011) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_27 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
The Development and Experimentation of an International Standard for Very Small Entities Involved in Software Development
Laporte, C. Y., & O’Connor, R. V. (2010) · Espace ÉTS (ETS) · Cited by 4
Self-citation
The relationship between process maturity models and the use and effectiveness of systems development methodologies
Rensburg, V., & Janse, C. W. (2012) · Cited by 4
Program management practices in context of Scrum : a case study of two South African software development SMMEs
Singh, A. (2015) · doi:10.51415/10321/1280 · Cited by 4
Integrating AI/ML into Agile Development
Medavarapu, S. V. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr24807035739 · Cited by 3
Developing Software for the Shopfloor on the Shopfloor: An Ethnographic Study of Software Engineering Practices In and For the Smart Factory
Ionescu, T. B. (2019) · International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE) · doi:10.1109/chase.2019.00018 · Cited by 3
Using ISO/IEC 29110 to Harness Process Improvement in Very Small Entities
O’Connor, R. V., & Laporte, C. Y. (2011) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_20 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
The Adoption of Software Process Improvement in Saudi Arabian Small and Medium Size Software Organizations: An Exploratory Study
Ateeq, M. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090328 · Cited by 3
Towards Conceptualizing Quality-Related Stakeholder Interactions in Software Development
Shekhovtsov, V. A., Mayr, H. C., & Kop, C. (2013) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38370-0_7 · Cited by 3
Deploying a Software Process Lifecycle Standard in Very Small Companies
O’Connor, R. V. (2014) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch073 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Software Process Improvement Health Checklist
Nikitina, N., & Kajko‐Mattsson, M. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_8 · Cited by 3
Project maturity evaluation model for SMEs from the software development sub-sector
Cuadros, A. J., Galindres, C., & Ruiz, P. (2016) · AD-minister · doi:10.17230/ad-minister.29.7 · Cited by 3
Empirical Investigation of Factors that Hamper Pursuing Software Process Improvement: Analyses of Saudi Practitioners’ Views
Zarour, M. (2018) · Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.3844/jcssp.2018.122.131 · Cited by 3
Demolishing the fear of theory to liberate higher education discourse and practice
Isomöttönen, V. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1918660 · Cited by 3
Theory on Non-Technical Characteristics Affecting Process Adoption in Small Software Companies: A Grounded Theory Study
Tuape, M., Hasheela-Mufeti, V. T., & Kasurinen, J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3209673 · Cited by 3
DESIGN, BUILD AND EVALUATION OF AN ONTOLOGY-BASED KMS FOR SUPPORTING CMMI-DEV UNDERSTANDING: BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS
Mora, M., O’Connor, R. V., Raisinghani, M. S., & Gelman, O. (2013) · International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1142/s0218194013500290 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Entrepreneurs’ social capital in struggles within market field
Šmaguc, T., & Vuković, K. (2020) · Management · doi:10.30924/mjcmi.25.2.5 · Cited by 2
The Evolution of the ISO/IEC 29110 Set of Standards and Guides
O’Connor, R. V., & Laporte, C. Y. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch083 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
The Discovery of Grounded Theory Practices for Software Engineering Research
Razali, R., Alqudah, M., & Zainal, D. A. P. (2020) · Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods · doi:10.34190/jbrm.18.2.007 · Cited by 3
Software Development Process Standards for Very Small Companies
O’Connor, R. V. (2018) · Advances in marketing, customer relationship management, and e-services book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7766-9.ch053 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Acquiring Empirical Knowledge to Support Intelligent Analysis of Quality-Related Issues in Software Development
Shekhovtsov, V. A., Mayr, H. C., & Kop, C. (2012) · International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC) · doi:10.1109/quatic.2012.19 · Cited by 2
Software process improvement as an organizational self-production process
Lopez, J. E. L., & Cifuentes, A. P. G. (2012) · Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI) · doi:10.1109/clei.2012.6427183 · Cited by 2
Developing software and systems engineering standards
O’Connor, R. V. (2015) · International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech) · doi:10.1145/2812428.2812430 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Qualitative Research on Practice in Small Software Companies
Stojanov, Ž. (2014) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch062 · Cited by 2
How software organizations are using the ISO/IEC 29110 standard's processes
Hauck, J. C. R., & Leal, S. (2020) · Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3422392.3422410 · Cited by 2
Abandonment of a Software Process Improvement Program: Insights from Case Studies
Albuquerque, R., Santos, G., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S. (2020) · Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (SBQS) · doi:10.1145/3439961.3439966 · Cited by 2
Maturity in Agile Software Development
Fontana, R. M., Reinehr, S., & Malucelli, A. (2016) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS) · doi:10.5753/sbqs.2016.15149 · Cited by 2
The ISO/IEC 29110 Software Lifecycle Standard for Very Small Companies
O’Connor, R. V. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch090 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Tacit Knowledge Formalization to Support the Adoption Process of Software Quality Models
Ocegueda-Miramontes, V., & Juárez‐Ramírez, R. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39515-4_16 · Cited by 2
The Effects of Software Process Evolution to Technical Debt—Perceptions from Three Large Software Projects
Yli-Huumo, J., Maglyas, A., & Smolander, K. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_15 · Cited by 2
Understanding the Role of Knowledge Management in Software Development
O’Connor, R. V., & Basri, S. B. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch019 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Translating Agile Development in Different Institutional Contexts: Dynamism, Pluralism, and Ratcheting over Time
Berente, N., Hansen, S., Rosenkranz, C., & Tumbas, S. (2026) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.0352 · Cited by 1
Situational Fit in Incremental Method Engineering
van de Weerd, I., Mirandolle, D., & Brinkkemper, S. (2012) · International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design · doi:10.4018/jismd.2012100102 · Cited by 1
Perspectives of delegation in team-based distributed software development over the GENI infrastructure (NIER track)
Tiako, P. (2011) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/1985793.1985905 · Cited by 1
Process Improvement and Knowledge Sharing in Small Software Companies: A Case Study
Kivihalme, M., Valsta, A., & Kauppinen, R. (2011) · International Conference on Software Engineering Advances · Cited by 1
ProPAM/Static: A Static View of a Methodology for Process and Project Alignment
Martins, P. V., & da Silva, A. R. (2015) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26285-7_5 · Cited by 1
Capability Maturity Model Integration (Cmmi) for Small Organizations
Scott, K. D. (2010) · ePublications at Regis University (Regis University) · Cited by 1
Using Grounded Theory to Acquire Knowledge About Critical Success Factors for Conducting Software Process Improvement Implementation Initiatives
Montoni, M. A., & Rocha, A. R. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2485-6.ch013 · Cited by 1
A Process Model of KMS Adoption and Diffusion in Organization: An Exploratory Study
Matayong, S., & Mahmood, A. K. (2011) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25462-8_26 · Cited by 1
Mobile app development : challenges and opportunities for automated support
Joorabchi, M. E. (2016) · Open Collections · doi:10.14288/1.0228781 · Cited by 1
Software Process Improvement for Small and Very Small Enterprises
Zarour, M., Abran, A., & Desharnais, J. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4301-7.ch066 · Cited by 1
Software process improvement programs
Albuquerque, R., Santos, G., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S. (2021) · Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development · doi:10.5753/jserd.2021.1944 · Cited by 1
Outsourced Offshore Software Testing Challenges and Mitigations
Pulipaka, A. A. S. (2014) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Knowledge Transfer Challenges and Mitigation Strategies in Global Software Development
Nidhra, S., & Yanamadala, M. (2012) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) · Cited by 1
Embracing or Constraining Change: An Exploration of Methodologies for Maintaining Software
Edberg, D., & Ivanova, P. (2011) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2011.183 · Cited by 1
Tailoring CMMI-DEV and RUP frameworks for ML2/3-compliance analysis
Monteiro, P. (2014) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 1
Software Development Process Standards for Very Small Companies
O’Connor, R. V. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch600 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Teste de software na indústria: um estudo qualitativo
Barbieri, S. L. (2018) · doi:10.11606/d.100.2018.tde-12062018-115510 · Cited by 1
Aplicação de Grounded Theory para Investigar Iniciativas de Implementação de Melhorias em Processos de Software
Montoni, M. A., & da Rocha, A. R. C. (2010) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS) · doi:10.5753/sbqs.2010.15428 · Cited by 1
Modelo de mejora para pruebas continuas
Mascheroni, M. A. (2021) · doi:10.35537/10915/122709 · Cited by 1
Process Improvement and Management
van Aartsengel, A., & Kurtoglu, S. (2013) · Management for professionals · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35904-0_10
Uma contribuição para a melhoria colaborativa e distribuída de processos de software
de Pinho, V. D. M. (2010) · doi:10.11606/t.55.2010.tde-18082010-143052
Investigating the relationship between software process improvement, situational change, and business success in software SMEs
Clarke, P. M. (2012) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)
TESIS DEFENDIDA POR
Hamet, M., & Nicolás, V. (2012)
Evidencia Empírica de la Minería de Procesos en la Implantación de CMMI-DEV
Velazquez-Solis, P. E., Flores-Rios, B. L., Astorga-Vargas, M. A., Ibarra-Esquer, J. E., Gonzalez-Navarro, F. F., & Pino, F. J. (2016) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Evidencia Empírica de la Minería de Procesos en la Implantación de CMMI-DEV - Empiric Evidence of Process Mining in CMMI-DEV Implementation
Velazquez-Solis, P. E., Flores-Rios, B. L., Astorga-Vargas, M. A., Ibarra-Esquer, J. E., Gonzalez-Navarro, F. F., & Pino, F. J. (2017) · RECIBE REVISTA ELECTRÓNICA DE COMPUTACIÓN INFORMÁTICA BIOMÉDICA Y ELECTRÓNICA · doi:10.32870/recibe.v5i3.69
Breath-Body-Self : an exploration of the body as a site for generating images for performance making
Matchett, S. (2016) · Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)
Melhoria de processo de software: Conhecimento, utilização e benefícios em empresas canadenses de desenvolvimento de software
Chevers, D. A. (2017) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · doi:10.1590/doi:
An Innovative Approach to the Development of an International Software Process Lifecycle Standard for Very Small Entities
O’Connor, R. V., & Laporte, C. Y. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch052
Self-citation
The ISO/IEC 29110 Software Lifecycle Standard for Very Small Companies
O’Connor, R. V. (2020) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3473-1.ch103
Self-citation
Rory V. O’Connor. In memoriam
Mora, M. (2020) · Investigación y Ciencia de la Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes · doi:10.33064/iycuaa2020803010
Catálogo de Benefícios Relatados por Organizações que Implementaram Melhoria de Processos de Software
Cruz, D., & Santos, G. (2017) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software (SBQS) · doi:10.5753/sbqs.2017.15098
A CMMI-Based Method for Software Development Process Assessment: Applying CMMI Process in Saudi Arabia
Aljedaibi, W. H., & Alsulami, A. A. (2021) · International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies
A Comparative Study of Students Performance in Object Oriented Programming (OOP) Using Java Before and During COVID-19 (A Case of Kapasa Makasa Campus)
Chimanga, K., Siluyele, N., Langton, S., & Nkonde, E. (2021) · American Journal of Networks and Communications · doi:10.11648/j.ajnc.20211001.11
Factors Influencing the Adoption of ISO/IEC 29110 in Thai Government Projects
Siddoo, V., & Wongsai, N. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch061
Software Process Lines
Niazi, M., & Zahran, S. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-141-2.ch001
An Objective Compliance Analysis of Project Management Process in Main Agile Methodologies with the ISO/IEC 29110 Entry Profile
Galván-Cruz, S., Mora, M., O’Connor, R. V., Acosta, F., & Rodríguez, F. J. Á. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch057
Self-citation
Software Process Improvement for Small and Very Small Enterprises
Zarour, M., Abran, A., & Desharnais, J. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-141-2.ch009
Methodology for ISO/IEC 29110 Profile Implementation in EPF Composer
Buchalcevová, A. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch019
Peer Review #1 of "Software process improvement: a systematic mapping study on the state of the art (v0.1)"
(2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.62v0.1/reviews/1
Peer Review #2 of "Software process improvement: a systematic mapping study on the state of the art (v0.1)"
(2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.62v0.1/reviews/2
Applying balanced scorecard in software process improvement: a case study of small software organization
Karahodža, B., Avdagić-Golub, E., & Čolaković, A. (2023) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.23919/mipro57284.2023.10159756
The pragmatics of hybridity: A grounded theory of method integration in software engineering projects
Adaba, G. B. (2026) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2026.112790

Authors: Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R.
Affiliations: Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
Dublin City University (IE)
Corresponding author: O’Connor, Rory
ORCID: O’Connor, Rory
Venue: Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2008-05
Volume: 81
Issue: 5
Pages: 772-784
ISSN: 0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.027
OpenAlex: W1977543826
Cited by: 202
References: 52
Citations by year: 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI: 20.57
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
hdl.handle.net
Licence: cc-by-nc-sa
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion)
Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion)
Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords: software development process, software process improvement, software process evolution, software management, software industry practices, implementation costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks