The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, this guidance does not extend to reporting GT studies.”
From Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,855
McGregor, D. (1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-054752-4.50008-7 · Cited by 4,861
Gosby, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-7-01210.x · Cited by 2,001
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249774 · Cited by 1,512
Grounded Theory and Organizational Research
Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638602200207 · Cited by 1,284
Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers
Goulding, C. (2002) · Cited by 925
Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model
Herbsleb, J. D., Zubrow, D., Goldenson, D. R., Hayes, W., & Paulk, M. C. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/255656.255692 · Cited by 417
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bach, J., 1994. The immaturity of CMM. In: American Programmer, vol. 7(9), pp. 13–18.
- Fitzgibbon, C., 1996. ISO 9001 registration: lessons learned by Canadian Software Companies. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Technology, Florida, pp. 193–201.
- New Oxford Thesaurus of English, 2001. Oxford University Press.
- Sliger, M., 2004. Fooling around with XP: why i lost interest in PMI and took up with something more extreme. In: Better Software, May/June, pp. 16–18.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–202 of 202
Software Project Management in Very Small Entities with ISO/IEC 29110
O’Connor, R. V., & Laporte, C. Y. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R.
- Affiliations
- Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
- Dublin City University (IE)
- Corresponding author
- O’Connor, Rory
- ORCID
- O’Connor, Rory
- Venue
- Journal of Systems and Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 772-784
- ISSN
- 0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977543826
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion)
- Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- software development process, software process improvement, software process evolution, software management, software industry practices, implementation costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
