Timing is everything: delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in initially stable trauma patients
Abstract
Background The indications for immediate intubation in trauma are not controversial, but some patients who initially appear stable later deteriorate and require intubation. We postulated that initially stable, moderately injured trauma patients who experienced delayed intubation have higher mortality than those intubated earlier. Methods Medical records of trauma patients intubated within 3 h of arrival in the emergency department at our university-based trauma center were reviewed. Moderately injured patients were defined as an ISS Results From February 2006 to December 2007, 279 trauma patients were intubated in the emergency department. In moderately injured patients, mortality was higher with delayed intubation than with early intubation, 11.8% versus 1.8% (P = 0.045). Patients with delayed intubations had greater frequency of rib fractures than their early intubation counterparts, 23.5% versus 3.6% (P = 0.004). Patients in the delayed intubation group had lower rates of cervical gunshot wounds than the early intubation group, 0% versus 10.7% (P = 0.048) and a trend toward fewer of skull fractures 2.9% versus 16.1%, (P = 0.054). Conclusions These findings suggest that delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in moderately injured patients who are initially stable but later require intubation and can be predicted by the presence of rib fractures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the hospital setting, delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in noncritically injured trauma patients.
“In the hospital setting, delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in noncritically injured trauma patients.11”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miraflor, E., Chuang, K., Miranda, M. A., Dryden, W., Yeung, L., Strumwasser, A., & Victorino, G. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Strumwasser, Aaron
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 286-290
- ISSN
- 0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026405961
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
- Keywords
- delayed intubation, early intubation, trauma patients, mortality, rib fractures, skull fracture, Injury Severity Score, emergency department
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Respiratory Insufficiency, Rib Fractures, Risk Factors, Skull Fractures, Time Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Wounds, Gunshot, Trauma Severity Indices, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review