Cited by 16Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsAbdominal Surgery and Complications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determining the clinical value of lactate in surgical patients on the intensive care unit

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study is first to assess the clinical value of lactate concentrations by comparison with clinical scoring systems, and second to determine the value of lactate levels in clinical decisions as ordering diagnostic and therapeutic (re)interventions in the population of critically ill surgical patients on the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methods From April 2010 to June 2011, the L-lactate concentrations, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were prospectively collected in surgical patients (n = 174) admitted into the ICU. The L-Lactate and scoring systems were related to events defined as performing computed tomography-scans, laparotomy, ultrasonography, and flexible endoscopy. Furthermore, all surgical complications were also registered. Results For SOFA scores above four points, mean lactate concentrations increased 4.5% for each point increase in SOFA score (P < 0.0005). In APACHE II scores above 16 points, mean lactate concentrations increased 2.9% for each point increase in APACHE II score (P < 0.0005). Each 10% increase in lactate concentration showed a 3.3% higher odds for a first event (OR 1.033; P = 0.26). Lactate levels did not correspond with more complications (OR 0.968; P = 0.52). Conclusions There is a significant positive relationship between lactate concentrations, high SOFA scores, and APACHE II scores. However, the important outcome is that lactate seems to be a poor predictor for surgical complications in the critically ill surgical patient in the ICU.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.048

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Kruse, 2011, Blood lactate as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in patients admitted acutely to hospital: a systematic review, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 19, 74, 10.1186/1757-7241-19-74 · DOI
  2. Lange, 1994, Usefulness of plasma lactate concentration in the diagnosis of acute abdominal disease, Eur J Surg, 160, 381
  3. Acosta, 2012, Current status on plasma biomarkers for acute mesenteric ischemia, J Thromb Thrombolysis, 33, 355, 10.1007/s11239-011-0660-z · DOI · Paper page
  4. Vahl, 1998, [Nothing gained from the determinations of plasma lactate levels in the evaluation of a patient with acute abdomen], Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 142, 901
  5. Pal, 2006, Admission serum lactate levels do not predict mortality in the acutely injured patient, J Trauma, 60, 583, 10.1097/01.ta.0000205858.82575.55 · DOI
  6. Howell, 2007, Occult hypoperfusion and mortality in patients with suspected infection, Intensive Care Med, 33, 1892, 10.1007/s00134-007-0680-5 · DOI
  7. Jansen, 2008, The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre-hospital setting: a pilot study, Crit Care, 12, R160, 10.1186/cc7159 · DOI
  8. Khosravani, 2009, Occurrence and adverse effect on outcome of hyperlactatemia in the critically ill, Crit Care, 13, R90, 10.1186/cc7918 · DOI
  9. Meregalli, 2004, Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased mortality in hemodynamically stable, high-risk, surgical patients, Crit Care, 8, R60, 10.1186/cc2423 · DOI
  10. Nguyen, 2004, Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock, Crit Care Med, 32, 1637, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000132904.35713.A7 · DOI
  11. Polonen, 2000, A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients, Anesth Analg, 90, 1052, 10.1097/00000539-200005000-00010 · DOI
  12. Vincent, 1996, The SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working group on sepsis-related Problems of the European Society of intensive care Medicine, Intensive Care Med, 22, 707, 10.1007/BF01709751 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Nielsen, 2011, D-lactate as a marker of venous-induced intestinal ischemia: an experimental study in pigs, Int J Surg, 9, 428, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.04.004 · DOI
  14. Murray, 1993, Serum D(-)-lactate levels as a predictor of acute intestinal ischemia in a rat model, J Surg Res, 54, 507, 10.1006/jsre.1993.1078 · DOI
  15. Acosta, 2007, L-lactate after embolization of the superior mesenteric artery, J Surg Res, 143, 320, 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.003 · DOI
  16. Murray, 1994, Serum D(-)-lactate levels as an aid to diagnosing acute intestinal ischemia, Am J Surg, 167, 575, 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90101-5 · DOI
  17. Blow, 1999, The golden hour and the silver day: detection and correction of occult hypoperfusion within 24 hours improves outcome from major trauma, J Trauma, 47, 964, 10.1097/00005373-199911000-00028 · DOI
  18. Jansen, 2009, Blood lactate monitoring in critically ill patients: a systematic health technology assessment, Crit Care Med, 37, 2827, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a98899 · DOI
  19. Claridge, 2000, Persistent occult hypoperfusion is associated with a significant increase in infection rate and mortality in major trauma patients, J Trauma, 48, 8, 10.1097/00005373-200001000-00003 · DOI
  20. James, 1999, Lactate is an unreliable indicator of tissue hypoxia in injury or sepsis, Lancet, 354, 505, 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)91132-1 · DOI
  21. Levy, 2005, Relation between muscle Na+K+ ATPase activity and raised lactate concentrations in septic shock: a prospective study, Lancet, 365, 871, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71045-X · DOI
  22. Bakker, 1996, Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock, Am J Surg, 171, 221, 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89552-9 · DOI
  23. Jansen, 2010, Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 182, 752, 10.1164/rccm.200912-1918OC · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, Z. C., Schreinemakers, J. M. J., Mulder, P. G. H., de Waal, R. A. L., Ermens, A. A. M., & van der Laan, L.
Affiliations
Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
Journal of Surgical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
183
Issue
2
Pages
814-820
ISSN
0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971510317
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
lactate, surgical intensive care unit, critically ill surgical patients, SOFA score, APACHE II score, organ failure, prognostic factors, surgical complications, diagnostic imaging, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Lactates, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, APACHE, Organ Dysfunction Scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review