Cited by 247Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research

An effective approach for software project effort and duration estimation with machine learning algorithms

Pospieszny, Przemyslaw, Czarnacka-Chrobot, Beata, Kobylinski, Andrzej·2018·Journal of Systems and Software

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.066

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pospieszny, P., Czarnacka-Chrobot, B., & Kobylinski, A.
Affiliations
SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL)
Venue
Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
137
Pages
184-196
ISSN
0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770963638
Cited by
247
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
FWCI
25.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Keywords
software effort estimation, machine learning deployment, ISBSG dataset, ensemble averaging, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, generalized linear models, decision support system, software project management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review