CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSystems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An anatomy of requirements engineering in software startups using multi-vocal literature and case survey

Tripathi, Nirnaya, Klotins, Eriks, Prikladnicki, Rafael, Oivo, Markku, Pompermaier, Leandro Bento, Kudakacheril, Arun Sojan, Unterkalmsteiner, Michael, Liukkunen, Kari, Gorschek, Tony·2018·Journal of Systems and Software
DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.059
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.059

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within startups, an early version of the final product is often used to validate product ideas with users, e.g. by demonstrating mock-ups to customers, as a cost-effective way to obtain market feedback.

    “Within startups, an early version of the final product is often used to validate product ideas with users (Alves et al. 2020;Tripathi et al. 2018), e.g. by demonstrating mock-ups to customers, as a cost-effective way to obtain market feedback.”

    From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Tripathi et al. 2018

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Achimugu, 2014, A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research, Inf. Softw. Technol., 56, 568, 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.001 · DOI
  2. Alves, 2010, Requirements engineering for software product lines: a systematic literature review, Inf. Softw. Technol., 52, 806, 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.014 · DOI
  3. Babar, 2014, Systematic reviews in requirements engineering: a systematic review, 43
  4. Bajwa, 2017, “Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups, Empir. Softw. Eng., 22, 2373, 10.1007/s10664-016-9458-0 · DOI
  5. Coleman, 2008, An investigation into software development process formation in software start-ups, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 21, 633, 10.1108/17410390810911221 · DOI
  6. Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., Damian, D., 2008. Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, 285–311. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fagerholm, 2017, The right model for continuous experimentation, J. Syst. Softw., 123, 292, 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.034 · DOI
  8. Giardino, 2016, Software development in startup companies: the greenfield startup model, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 42, 585, 10.1109/TSE.2015.2509970 · DOI
  9. Holl, 2012, A systematic review and an expert survey on capabilities supporting multi product lines, Inf. Softw. Technol., 54, 828, 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.02.002 · DOI
  10. Kane, T. J., 2010. The Importance of Startups in Job Creation and Job Destruction. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1646934. · DOI
  11. Klotins, 2018, Software engineering in start-up companies: an analysis of 88 experience reports, Empir. Softw. Eng., 1
  12. Large, 2005, Best marketing and sales practices for technology start-ups: a review and fresh evidence, 1, 339
  13. Larsson, 1993, Case survey methodology: quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies, Acad. Manag. J., 36, 1515, 10.2307/256820 · DOI
  14. Marion, 2009, New product development practice application to an early-stage firm: the case of the paperpro® stackmaster™, Des. Studies, 30, 561, 10.1016/j.destud.2009.02.001 · DOI
  15. Melegati, J., Goldman, A., Paulo, S., 2016. Requirements engineering in software startups: a grounded theory approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Startups Workshop on Software StartupsTrondheim, Norway. · DOI
  16. Pacheco, 2012, A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation, J. Syst. Softw., 85, 2171, 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.075 · DOI
  17. Paternoster, 2014, Software development in startup companies: a systematic mapping study, Inf. Softw. Technol., 56, 1200, 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Rabiser, 2010, Requirements for product derivation support: results from a systematic literature review and an expert survey, Inf. Softw. Technol., 52, 324, 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.001 · DOI
  19. Runeson, 2009, Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, Empir. Softw. Eng., 14, 131, 10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Tripathi, 2016, Exploring processes in small software companies: a systematic review, 150
  21. Verner, 2007, State of the practice: an exploratory analysis of schedule estimation and software project success prediction, Inf. Softw. Technol., 49, 181, 10.1016/j.infsof.2006.05.001 · DOI
  22. Wieringa, 2006, Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion, Requir. Eng., 11, 102, 10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tripathi, N., Klotins, E., Prikladnicki, R., Oivo, M., Pompermaier, L. B., Kudakacheril, A. S., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Liukkunen, K., & Gorschek, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Tripathi, Nirnaya
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
146
Pages
130-151
ISSN
0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.059
OpenAlex
W2888929421
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Keywords
requirements engineering, software startups, requirements analysis, requirements documentation, requirements prioritization, requirements validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review