Impact of mentoring for underrepresented groups in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives Despite efforts to mitigate challenges to advance underrepresented groups (URG) groups' representation in medical education, diversity remains underwhelming. In response to this several mentoring programs to increase diversification within medical education have been implemented. However, the impact of these programs on URG representation across disciplines is unknown. The aim of this review is to evaluate the impact of structured mentoring programs on URGs in undergraduate medical education. Design Systematic review. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was performed of electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid Medline, and EMBASE between January and September 2022 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Both qualitative and quantitative outcomes including characteristics of the mentoring structure explored within each study were collected, and differences in study outcomes analyzed. Results In total 17 studies were included for analysis. Mentoring within URGs resulted in an increase in research opportunities, exam performance, medical specialty applications, and residency matching. Structured feedback yielded positive experiences by both mentors and mentees participating in programs, with both emotional and cultural competence issues explored across studies included for analysis. Conclusions Mentoring for medical students underrepresented in medicine across mentoring relationships including peer, seni…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several systematic and scoping reviews have synthesized efforts at later stages of medical training, such as interventions to increase the diversity of residency programs or to mentor students already enrolled in graduate medical education.
“Several systematic and scoping reviews have synthesized efforts at later stages of medical training, such as interventions to increase the diversity of residency programs or to mentor students already enrolled in graduate medical education [3,31].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Institutions have begun implementing targeted "pipeline" or "outreach" programs designed to reach URiM students and provide support and career development in healthcare.
“To address these challenges, institutions have begun implementing targeted “pipeline” or “outreach” programs designed to reach URiM students and provide support and career development in healthcare.”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peer Mentoring by Medical Students for Medical Students: A Scoping Review
Preovolos, C., Grant, A., Rayner, M., Fitzgerald, K., & Ng, L. (2024) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-024-02108-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review
Jaganathan, N., Guntaka, R., Goel, V., Odo, N., Sun, Z., & Arthur, M. E. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.109396
- Authors
- Feeley, A. A., Feeley, I. H., Sheehan, E., Carroll, C., & Queally, J.
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore (IE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Feeley, Aoife A
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-366
- ISSN
- 1878-7452 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-7204
- OpenAlex
- W4390414264
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of surgical education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- mentoring programs, underrepresented groups, undergraduate medical education, peer mentoring, research opportunities, exam performance, residency match, career paths
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Mentors, Minority Groups, Students, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review