The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On prediction error correlation in Bayesian model updating
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, accounting for correlation can be challenging due to the difficulty of specifying an appropriate description in the likelihood function, and the additional computational effort required to infer the corresponding parameters [53,54].”
From On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“It should be noted that in many applications, particularly when using data obtained from spatially dense sensor grids sampling at high frequencies, spatial and temporal correlation may be present in the discrepancies between measurements and model predictions which can have a significant influence on the estimated posterior distribution.”
From On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Mottershead, 1993, Model updating in structural dynamics, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 167, 347, 10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340 · DOI
- Teughels, 2004, Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Z24 by FE model updating, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 278, 589, 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.041 · DOI
- Beck, 1998, Updating models and their uncertainties. I, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124, 455, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455) · DOI
- Katafygiotis, 1998, Updating models and their uncertainties. II, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124, 463, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(463) · DOI
- Kennedy, 2001, Bayesian calibration of computer models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 63, 425, 10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · DOI · Paper page
- K.-V. Yuen, S.-C. Kuok, Bayesian Methods for Updating Dynamic Models, Applied Mechanics Reviews 64 (1) (2011). · DOI
- Bernardo, 1979, Reference posterior distributions for Bayesian inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 41, 113, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01066.x · DOI
- Jaynes, 1985, Highly informative priors, Bayesian Statistics, 2, 329
- Berger, 2009, The formal definition of reference priors, Annals of Statistics, 37, 905, 10.1214/07-AOS587 · DOI
- L. Katafygiotis, C. Papadimitriou, H. Lam, A probabilistic approach to structural model updating, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 17 (1998) 495–507. · DOI
- Sohn, 2000, Bayesian probabilistic damage detection of a reinforced-concrete bridge column, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29, 1131, 10.1002/1096-9845(200008)29:8<1131::AID-EQE959>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
- Beck, 2001, Monitoring structural health using a probabilistic measure, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 16, 1, 10.1111/0885-9507.00209 · DOI
- Ching, 2004, New Bayesian model updating algorithm applied to a structural health monitoring benchmark, Structural Health Monitoring, 4, 313, 10.1177/1475921704047499 · DOI
- Yuen, 2006, Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 13, 91, 10.1002/stc.144 · DOI · Paper page
- Christodoulou, 2007, Structural identification based on optimally weighted modal residuals, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21, 4, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.011 · DOI
- Muto, 2008, Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation, Journal of Vibration and Control, 14, 7, 10.1177/1077546307079400 · DOI
- Ntotsios, 2009, Bridge health monitoring system based on vibration measurements, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 7, 469, 10.1007/s10518-008-9067-4 · DOI
- Goller, 2011, Investigation of model uncertainties in Bayesian structural model updating, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330, 6122, 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.07.036 · DOI
- Soize, 2008, Construction of probability distributions in high dimensions using the maximum entropy principle, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 75, 1583, 10.1002/nme.2385 · DOI
- Vuran, 2004, Spatio-temporal correlation, Computer Networks, 45, 245, 10.1016/j.comnet.2004.03.007 · DOI
- Soize, 2000, A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 15, 277, 10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00028-4 · DOI
- Soize, 2005, A comprehensive overview of a non-parametric probabilistic approach of model uncertainties for predictive models in structural dynamics, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 288, 623, 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.07.009 · DOI
- Soize, 2003, Random matrix theory and non-parametric model of random uncertainties in vibration analysis, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 263, 893, 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01170-7 · DOI
- Soize, 2010, Generalized probabilistic approach of uncertainties in computational dynamics using random matrices and polynomial chaos decompositions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 81, 939, 10.1002/nme.2712 · DOI
- Diaconis, 1979, Conjugate priors for exponential families, Annals of Statistics, 7, 269, 10.1214/aos/1176344611 · DOI
- Haario, 2006, DRAM, Statistics and Computing, 16, 339, 10.1007/s11222-006-9438-0 · DOI
- Beck, 2002, Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128, 380, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380) · DOI
- Ching, 2007, Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 133, 816, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816) · DOI
- Papadimitriou, 1997, Asymptotic expansions for reliability and moments of uncertain systems, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123, 1219, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:12(1219) · DOI
- Papadimitriou, 2012, The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 28, 105, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.019 · DOI
- McFarland, 2008, Multivariate significance testing and model calibration under uncertainty, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197, 2467, 10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.030 · DOI
- Cheung, 2011, Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 1137, 10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.013 · DOI
- Beck, 2004, Model selection using response measurements, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130, 192, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192) · DOI
- Yuen, 2010, Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering, Structural Safety, 32, 338, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.03.011 · DOI
- Beck, 2010, Bayesian system identification based on probability logic, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17, 825, 10.1002/stc.424 · DOI
- Cheung, 2010, Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25, 304, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00642.x · DOI
- Gelfand, 1994, Bayesian model choice, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 56, 501, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb01996.x · DOI
- Skilling, 2006, Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation, Bayesian Analysis, 1, 833, 10.1214/06-BA127 · DOI
- J. Beck, Bayesian updating and model class selection of deteriorating hysteretic structural models using seismic response data, Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rethymno, Crete, Greece, 2007.
- J. Beck, Using model classes in system identification for robust response predictions, Proceedings of COMPDYN 2009, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodos, Greece, 2009.
- Kalman, 1960, A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 82D, 35, 10.1115/1.3662552 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of finite element model updating methods for structural applications
Ereiz, S., Duvnjak, I., & Fernando Jiménez-Alonso, J. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.041 · Cited by 371
Kamariotis, A., Vlachas, K., Ntertimanis, V., Koune, I., Cicirello, A., & Chatzi, E. (2025) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4067140 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Simoen, E., Papadimitriou, C., & Lombaert, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Sound and Vibration
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4136-4152
- ISSN
- 0022-460X
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
