Cited by 92Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsAdvanced machining processes and optimizationVibration and Dynamic Analysis

Quenching chatter instability in turning process with a vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink

Open access
Gourc, E., Seguy, S., Michon, G., Berlioz, A., Mann, B.P.·2015·Journal of Sound and Vibration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.06.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 92

Authors
Gourc, E., Seguy, S., Michon, G., Berlioz, A., & Mann, B. P.
Affiliations
  • Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse (FR)
  • Institut Clément Ader (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
355
Pages
392-406
ISSN
0022-460X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W798462592
Cited by
92
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Keywords
chatter, turning, stability lobe diagram, tool flexibility, asymptotic analysis, nonlinear stiffness, lathe tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review