A lever-type nonlinear energy sink
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lever-type NES was firstly proposed for effective suppression of harmonic excitation resonance amplitudes in a 2-DOF dynamical system.
“The lever-type NES (LNES) was firstly proposed in [141] for effective suppression of harmonic excitation resonance amplitudes in 2-DOF dynamical system.”
From A review on nonlinear energy sinks: designs, analysis and applications of impact and rotary types (2023) · cites this paper as [141]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Zang, J., Yuan, T.-C., Lu, Z.-Q., Zhang, Y.-W., Ding, H., & Chen, L.-Q.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Li-Qun
- Venue
- Journal of Sound and Vibration
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 437
- Pages
- 119-134
- ISSN
- 0022-460X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890794053
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572182, 11872159, 11232009)
- Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (2017-01-07-00-09-E00019)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
- Keywords
- nonlinear energy sink, vibration suppression, spacecraft vibration, transmissibility, harmonic excitation, quasi-periodic motion, nonlinear stiffness, mass reduction, two-degree-of-freedom system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
