Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosing Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women: Sexual History Taking and the Role of Symptom Scales and Questionnaires

Hatzichristou, Dimitris, Kirana, Paraskevi-Sofia, Banner, Linda, Althof, Stanley E., Lonnee-Hoffmann, Risa A.M., Dennerstein, Lorraine, Rosen, Raymond C.·2016·The Journal of Sexual Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A detailed sexual history is the cornerstone for all sexual problem assessments and sexual dysfunction diagnoses. Diagnostic evaluation is based on an in-depth sexual history, including sexual and gender identity and orientation, sexual activity and function, current level of sexual function, overall health and comorbidities, partner relationship and interpersonal factors, and the role of cultural and personal expectations and attitudes. AIM: To propose key steps in the diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunctions, with special focus on the use of symptom scales and questionnaires. METHODS: Critical assessment of the current literature by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A revised algorithm for the management of sexual dysfunctions, level of evidence, and recommendation for scales and questionnaires. RESULTS: The International Consultation on Sexual Medicine proposes an updated algorithm for diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunction in men and women, with specific recommendations for sexual history taking and diagnostic evaluation. Standardized scales, checklists, and validated questionnaires are additional adjuncts that should be used routinely in sexual problem evaluation. Scales developed for specific patient groups are included. Results of this evaluation are presented with recommendations for clinical and research uses. CONCLUSION: Defined principles, an algorithm and a range of scales may provide coherent and evidence based management for sexual dysfunctions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Hatzichristou, D., Kirana, P.-S., Banner, L., Althof, S. E., Lonnee-Hoffmann, R. A. M., Dennerstein, L., & Rosen, R. C.
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2016-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1166-1182
ISSN
1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017
OpenAlex
W2492232897
Cited by
160
References
11
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosing Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women: Sexual History Taking and the Role of Symptom Scales and Questionnaires. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017
The paper
Hatzichristou, D., Kirana, P.-S., Banner, L., Althof, S. E., Lonnee-Hoffmann, R. A. M., Dennerstein, L., & Rosen, R. C. (2016). Diagnosing Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women: Sexual History Taking and the Role of Symptom Scales and Questionnaires. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.