Cited by 26Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsGenital Health and Disease

The Penile Sensitivity Ratio: A Novel Application of Biothesiometry to Assess Changes in Penile Sensitivity

Wiggins, Adam, Farrell, M. Ryan, Tsambarlis, Peter, Levine, Laurence A.·2019·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Biothesiometry allows for evaluation of penile vibratory sensitivity and can be used as a non-invasive and rapid surrogate test of penile sexual sensitivity. However, no standardized measurement methodology currently exists. Aim To describe and optimize a novel, standardized biothesiometry parameter-the penile sensitivity ratio (PSR). Methods We reviewed all biothesiometry data from men presenting to our institution from July 2013-May 2017. 3 iterations of the PSR were evaluated using the threshold for vibratory detection from a combination of different input variables including the penile glans, penile shaft, index finger, and thigh. Numerator values for the PSR included the penile glans and penile shaft, whereas denominator inputs included the index finger and thigh. PSR is inversely correlated with penile sensitivity. Main outcome measure The primary outcome measure was the association between reported diminished penile sensitivity and PSR value. Secondary outcome measures were the association between PSR and age, diabetes, ejaculatory dysfunction, and Peyronie's disease (PD). Results Biothesiometry data were evaluated from 1,239 men. Mean age was 53.2 years (SD 14.0 years). Diabetes was present in 7.4% (n = 92); 52.0% (n = 644) had PD. Ejaculatory dysfunction was identified in 15.8% (n = 196), with 12.2% (n = 151) having premature ejaculation and 3.6% (n = 45) reporting delayed ejaculation. Decreased penile sensitivity was reported in 20.3% (n = 252). 3 PSR i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiggins, A., Farrell, M. R., Tsambarlis, P., & Levine, L. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Farrell, M. Ryan
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2019-02-14
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
447-451
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2791222819
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
Keywords
biothesiometry, Peyronie's disease, ejaculatory dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, premature ejaculation, delayed ejaculation, penile shaft, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ejaculation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Induration, Penis, Young Adult, Premature Ejaculation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review