Cited by 41Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer

The segmentation clock in mice: interaction between the Wnt and Notch signalling pathways

Rodríguez-González, J.G., Santillán, M., Fowler, A.C., Mackey, Michael C.·2007·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

In the last few years, the efforts to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the segmentation clock in various vertebrate species have multiplied. Early evidence suggested that oscillations are caused by one of the genes under the Notch signalling pathway (like those of the her or Hes families). Recently, Aulehla et al. [Wnt3a plays a major role in the segmentation clock controlling somitogenesis. Dev. Cell 4, 395-406] discovered that Axin2 (a gene under the Wnt3a signalling pathway) also oscillates in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) of mice embryos and proposed some mechanisms through which the Notch and Wnt3a pathways may interact. They further suggested that a decreasing concentration of Wnt3a along the PSM may be the gradient the segmentation clock interacts with to form somites. These results were reviewed by Rida et al. [A notch feeling of somite segmentation and beyond. Dev. Biol. 265, 2-22], who introduced a complex clockwork comprising genes Hes1, Lfng (under the Notch pathway), and Axin2, as well as their multiple interactions. In the present work we develop a mathematical model based on the Rida et al. review and use it to tackle some of the questions raided by the Aulehla et al. paper: can the Axin2 feedback loop constitute a clock? Could a decreasing Wnt3a signaling constitute the wavefront, where phase is recorded and the spatial pattern laid down? What is the master oscillator?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 41

Authors
Rodríguez-González, J. G., Santillán, M., Fowler, A. C., & Mackey, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Santillán, M.
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
248
Issue
1
Pages
37-47
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126714704
Cited by
41
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • Academia Mexicana de Ciencias
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Keywords
segmentation clock, somitogenesis, Wnt3a signaling, Notch signaling, Axin2, presomitic mesoderm, Hes1, Lfng, mathematical model, wavefronts, master oscillator, mouse embryo
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Computer Simulation, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Models, Biological, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Somites, Embryonic Development, Mice, Receptor, Notch1, Axin Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review