Cited by 51Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Cooperation, behavioural synchrony and status in social networks

Dávid-Barrett, Tamás, Dunbar, R.I.M.·2012·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

In this paper we present a new approach to modelling group coordination, based on dyadic synchronisation in a non-panmictic, structured network (a problem that applies widely to all species that live in medium to large groups). Using this approach, we present three models with three new theoretical results. (1) Multi-layered networks are optimal for groups that face costs associated with maintaining relationships among the members, combined with costs associated with information flows. (2) The presence of a social hierarchy can be an adaptive feature of the community: the steeper the optimal social hierarchy is, the fewer relationships group members need to have. (3) Falling communication costs lead to a less steep optimal social hierarchy in communities in which socially useful information is evenly distributed, but to an even steeper social hierarchy in groups in which socially useful information is uneven. Thus we show how, when communication is costly, cooperation can give rise to communities that are socially highly structured.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.05.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchrony rituals benefit cooperation.

    “synchrony rituals benefit cooperation (Wiltermuth and Heath, 2009; David-Barrett and Dunbar, 2012).”

    From Music structure determines heart rate variability of singers (2013) · cites this paper as David-Barrett and Dunbar, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dávid-Barrett, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M.
Affiliations
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Dávid-Barrett, Tamás
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
308
Pages
88-95
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057994352
Cited by
51
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
cooperation, behavioral synchrony, social hierarchy, social networks, group coordination, multilayer networks, communication overhead, information flow, social status, social structure
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Cooperative Behavior, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Theoretical, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review