Cited by 43Origins and Evolution of LifeEvolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Multispecies population dynamics of prebiotic compositional assemblies

Open access
Markovitch, Omer, Lancet, Doron·2014·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

Present life portrays a two-tier phenomenology: molecules compose supramolecular structures, such as cells or organisms, which in turn portray population behaviors, including selection, evolution and ecological dynamics. Prebiotic models have often focused on evolution in populations of self-replicating molecules, without explicitly invoking the intermediate molecular-to-supramolecular transition. Here, we explore a prebiotic model that allows one to relate parameters of chemical interaction networks within molecular assemblies to emergent population dynamics. We use the graded autocatalysis replication domain (GARD) model, which simulates the network dynamics within amphiphile-containing molecular assemblies, and exhibits quasi-stationary compositional states termed compotype species. These grow by catalyzed accretion, divide and propagate their compositional information to progeny in a replication-like manner. The model allows us to ask how molecular network parameters influence assembly evolution and population dynamics parameters. In 1000 computer simulations, each embodying different parameter set of the global chemical interaction network parameters, we observed a wide range of behaviors. These were analyzed by a multi species logistic model often used for analyzing population ecology (r-K or Lotka-Volterra competition model). We found that compotypes with a larger intrinsic molecular repertoire show a higher intrinsic growth (r) and lower carrying capacity (K), as well as lower replication fidelity. This supports a prebiotic scenario initiated by fast-replicating assemblies with a high molecular diversity, evolving into more faithful replicators with narrower molecular repertoires.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only when too many mutations sequentially occur, the GARD assembly exits one basin of composomal attraction, transiting to drift or entering another composome.

    “Only when too many mutations sequentially occur, the GARD assembly exits one basin of composomal attraction, transiting to drift or entering another composome.”
  • There is a correlation between a composome's restricted repertoire size NMOL and the ecology-like population-growth rate in simulations of composomal populations.

    “In a broader realm, this is exemplified by a correlation seen between a composome's restricted repertoire size NMOL (the subset of environmental molecular types taking part in this composome) and the ecology-like population-growth rate in simulations of composomal populations [64].”
  • Typical GARD simulations show that the internal kinetics leads from a completely random composition to a composome in a relatively small number of growth-split cycles.

    “Despite such sparse fitness landscape, typical GARD simulations show that the internal kinetics leads from a completely random composition to a composome in a relatively small number of growth–split cycles.”
  • In constant population reactor simulations, one observes several compotypes of a given β matrix at the same time, as well as drift.

    “In such simulations, one observes several compotypes (clusters of similar composomes) of a given β matrix at the same time, as well as drift (weakly reproducing or non-reproducing assemblies).”
  • When the assembly is in or near reproducing composomes, the average internal repertoire drops to NMOL = 15.9 ± 5.5, with the rest of the compounds absent.

    “By contrast, when the assembly is in or near reproducing composomes, the average internal repertoire drops to NMOL = 15.9 ± 5.5 [64], with the rest of the compounds absent (figure 9a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markovitch, O., & Lancet, D.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
Lancet, Doron
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
357
Pages
26-34
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165108069
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Weizmann Institute of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
prebiotic evolution, molecular assembly, amphiphile self-assembly, population dynamics, Lotka-Volterra competition, replication fidelity, carrying capacity
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Chemical, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review