Cited by 19Origins and Evolution of LifeEvolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Predicting species emergence in simulated complex pre-biotic networks

Open access
Markovitch, Omer, Krasnogor, Natalio·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

An intriguing question in evolution is what would happen if one could "replay" life's tape. Here, we explore the following hypothesis: when replaying the tape, the details ("decorations") of the outcomes would vary but certain "invariants" might emerge across different life-tapes sharing similar initial conditions. We use large-scale simulations of an in silico model of pre-biotic evolution called GARD (Graded Autocatalysis Replication Domain) to test this hypothesis. GARD models the temporal evolution of molecular assemblies, governed by a rates matrix (i.e. network) that biases different molecules' likelihood of joining or leaving a dynamically growing and splitting assembly. Previous studies have shown the emergence of so called compotypes, i.e., species capable of replication and selection response. Here, we apply networks' science to ascertain the degree to which invariants emerge across different life-tapes under GARD dynamics and whether one can predict these invariant from the chemistry specification alone (i.e. GARD's rates network representing initial conditions). We analysed the (complex) rates' network communities and asked whether communities are related (and how) to the emerging species under GARD's dynamic, and found that the communities correspond to the species emerging from the simulations. Importantly, we show how to use the set of communities detected to predict species emergence without performing any simulations. The analysis developed here may impact complex systems simulations in general.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0192871

Cites

78 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Composomes are much more likely to be RAFs because compounds belonging to a composome overlap with communities within β-matrix-defined subsets of more tightly linked network nodes.

    “On the other hand, as the compounds belonging to a composome show overlap with communities within the β-matrix-defined subsets of more tightly linked network nodes [27,92] (see §8), it follows that composomes are much more likely to be RAFs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Rasmussen S. Protocells: Mit Press; 2009.
  2. [2]Dyson F. Origins of life: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  3. [13]Kauffman SA. The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution: Oxford university press; 1993.
  4. [30]Oparin AI. Evolution of Concepts of Origin of Life, 1924–1974. Origins Life Evol B. 1976; 7(1): 3– 8. doi: 10.1007/Bf01218509 WOS:A1976CE36200001. 967402 · DOI
  5. [46]Gould. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (Book). Library Journal. 1989; 114(14): 214–.
  6. [47]Kauffman S. At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity: Oxford university press; 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markovitch, O., & Krasnogor, N.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Krasnogor, Natalio
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e0192871
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793430884
Cited by
19
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J004111/2, EP/N031962/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
autocatalysis, network communities, in silico evolution, molecular assembly, origin of life
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Models, Theoretical, Evolution, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review