Cited by 6Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicroRNA in disease regulationCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Endogenous miRNA sponges mediate the generation of oscillatory dynamics for a non-coding RNA network

Open access
Dhawan, Andrew, Harris, Adrian L., Buffa, Francesca M., Scott, Jacob G.·2019·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Oscillations are crucial to the normal function of living organisms, across a wide variety of biological processes. In eukaryotes, oscillatory dynamics are thought to arise from interactions at the protein and RNA levels; however, the role of non-coding RNA in regulating these dynamics remains understudied. In this work, we show how non-coding RNA acting as microRNA (miRNA) sponges in a conserved miRNA - transcription factor feedback motif, can give rise to oscillatory behaviour, and how to test for this experimentally. Control of these non-coding RNA can dynamically create oscillations or stability, and we show how this behaviour predisposes to oscillations in the stochastic limit. These results, supported by emerging evidence for the role of miRNA sponges in development, point towards key roles of different species of miRNA sponges, such as circular RNA, potentially in the maintenance of yet unexplained oscillatory behaviour. These results help to provide a paradigm for understanding functional differences between the many redundant, but distinct RNA species thought to act as miRNA sponges in nature, such as long non-coding RNA, pseudogenes, competing mRNA, circular RNA, and3' UTRs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.10.055

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dhawan, A., Harris, A. L., Buffa, F. M., & Scott, J. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, Jacob G.
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
481
Pages
54-60
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949304353
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (S_3470, 23969)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
microRNA sponge, oscillatory dynamics, non-coding RNA, circular RNA, long non-coding RNA, pseudogenes, competing endogenous RNA, 3' untranslated region, stochastic dynamics, biological oscillations
MeSH terms
RNA, Circular, Biological Clocks, Gene Expression Regulation, Models, Genetic, MicroRNAs, Gene Regulatory Networks, RNA, Long Noncoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review