Effect of body fat and gender on body temperature distribution
Abstract
It is well known that body composition can influence peripheral heat loss and skin temperature. That the distribution of body fat is affected by gender is well known; however, there is little information on how body composition and gender influences the measure of skin temperature. This study evaluated skin temperature distribution according to body fat percentage (BF%) and gender. A sample of 94 apparently healthy volunteers (47 women and 47 men) was assessed with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and infrared thermography (mean, maximum and minimum temperatures - T Mean, T Max and T Min). The sample was divided into groups, according to health risk classification, based on BF%, as proposed by the American College of Sports Medicine: Average (n = 58), Elevated (n = 16) or High (n = 20). Women had lower T Mean in most regions of interest (ROI). In both genders, group High had lower temperature values than Average and Elevated in the trunk, upper and lower limbs. In men, palms and posterior hands had a tendency (p < 0.05) for increased temperature along with increased BF%. T Mean, T Max and T Min of trunk, upper and lower limbs were negatively correlated with BF% and the fat percentage of each segment (upper limbs, lower limbs and trunk). The highest correlations found in women were between posterior trunk and BF% (rho = -0.564, p < 0.001) and, in men, between anterior trunk and BF% (rho = -0.760, p < 0.001). Overall, this study found that women have lower skin temperature than men, which was related with higher BF%. Facial temperature seems not to be influenced by body fat. With the future collection of data on the relationship between BF% and skin temperature while taking into account factors such as body morphology, gender, and ethnicity, we conclude that measurement of BF may be reliably estimated with the use of thermal imaging technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Skin surface temperature depends on vascularity and the anatomical location where the measurement is performed.
“The surface temperature of the skin depends on the vascularity and anatomical location where the measurement is performed [142].”
From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [142]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Neves, E. B., Salamunes, A. C. C., de Oliveira, R. M., & Stadnik, A. M. W.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Neves, Eduardo Borba
- Venue
- Journal of Thermal Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0306-4565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766630798
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Thermal Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universidade Federal do Paraná
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- body fat percentage, skin temperature distribution, gender differences, body composition, infrared thermography, limb temperature, facial skin temperature, body fat estimation, health risk classification
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Arm, Face, Female, Hand, Humans, Leg, Male, Sex Characteristics, Skin Temperature, Thermography, Absorptiometry, Photon, Young Adult, Torso
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review