Cited by 66Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockThermoregulation and physiological responsesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Sows’ responses to increased heat load—A review

Bjerg, Bjarne, Brandt, Pia, Pedersen, Poul, Zhang, Guoqiang·2020·Journal of Thermal Biology

Abstract

There is a comprehensive body of literature on how increased air temperature affects the physiology, production and behaviour of sows, while very few studies consider the thermal effects of air humidity and air velocity. This review summarises studies that have investigated effects of air temperature by reviewing published literature in which sows were exposed to at least two different levels of air temperature ranging from 15 °C to 39 °C. Increased rectal temperature was investigated in the majority of the studies (26) and on average, the rectal temperature increased by 0.099 °C per °C increased air temperature above 25 °C. The increase was smaller at lower air temperatures, and it was suggested that rectal temperature is practically unaffected by air temperatures in the range of 15 °C-21 °C. This review elucidates how air temperature also affects performance indicators such as respiration rate, vaginal temperature, skin temperature, feed intake, milk yield, body weight loss during lactation, mortality, litter daily weight gain during lactation and sow behaviour. One study reported how respiration rate, rectal temperature, vaginal temperature and skin temperature were affected by both air temperature and air humidity, and the results suggest that the relative significance of air temperature and humidity may be similar for sows and finishing pigs (e.g. an increase of 40% relative humidity at an air temperature of 30 °C has a similar effect as a 1.9 °C increase in temperature). Studies on mitigation methods against the effects of high temperature and humidity such as snout cooling, drip cooling and floor cooling were reviewed to extract knowledge related to the effects of air velocity, temperatures of surrounding surfaces and the opportunity for sows to moisten their skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102758

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjerg, B., Brandt, P., Pedersen, P., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Bjerg, Bjarne
Venue
Journal of Thermal Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
94
Pages
102758
ISSN
0306-4565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091967007
Cited by
66
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Thermal Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Innovationsfonden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
sows, heat stress, air temperature, rectal temperature, air humidity, air velocity, sow behavior, respiration rate, feed intake, milk yield, litter weight gain, floor cooling, surface temperature
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Temperature, Eating, Female, Hot Temperature, Humidity, Lactation, Respiration, Swine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review