Cited by 91Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research StudiesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Clinicopathological Characteristics of RET Rearranged Lung Cancer in European Patients

Open access
Michels, Sebastian, Scheel, Andreas Hans, Scheffler, Matthias, Schultheis, Anne Maria, Gautschi, Oliver, Aebersold, Franziska, Diebold, Joachim, Pall, Georg +31 more·2016·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction Rearrangements of RET are rare oncogenic events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the characterization of Asian patients suggests a predominance of nonsmokers of young age in this genetically defined lung cancer subgroup, little is known about the characteristics of non-Asian patients. We present the results of an analysis of a European cohort of patients with RET rearranged NSCLC. Methods Nine hundred ninety-seven patients with KRAS/EGFR/ALK wildtype lung adenocarcinomas were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for RET fusions. Tumor specimens were molecularly profiled and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected. Results Rearrangements of RET were identified in 22 patients, with a prevalence of 2.2% in the KRAS/EGFR/ALK wildtype subgroup. Co-occurring genetic aberrations were detected in 10 patients, and the majority had mutations in TP53. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 39-80 years; mean ± SD, 61 ± 11.7 years) with a higher proportion of men (59% versus 41%). There was only a slight predominance of nonsmokers (54.5%) compared to current or former smokers (45.5%). Conclusions Patients with RET rearranged adenocarcinomas represent a rare and heterogeneous NSCLC subgroup. In some contrast to published data, we see a high prevalence of current and former smokers in our white RET cohort. The significance of co-occurring aberrations, so far, is unclear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.016

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Clinical Lung Cancer Genome Project (CLCGP), Network Genomic Medicine (NGM). A genomics-based classi- ficaton of human lung tumors. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:209ra153.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michels, S., Scheel, A. H., Scheffler, M., Schultheis, A. M., Gautschi, O., Aebersold, F., Diebold, J., Pall, G., Rothschild, S., Bubendorf, L., Hartmann, W., Heukamp, L., Schildhaus, H.-U., Fassunke, J., Ihle, M. A., Künstlinger, H., Heydt, C., Fischer, R., Nogovà, L., Mattonet, C., Hein, R., Adams, A., Gerigk, U., Schulte, W., Lüders, H., Grohé, C., Graeven, U., Müller-Naendrup, C., Draube, A., Kambartel, K.-O., Krüger, S., Schulze-Olden, S., Serke, M., Engel-Riedel, W., Kaminsky, B., Randerath, W., Merkelbach-Bruse, S., Büttner, R., & Wolf, J.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Johanniter-Krankenhaus Bonn (DE)
  • Evangelische Lungenklinik Berlin (DE)
  • Kliniken Maria Hilf (DE)
  • Bethanien Krankenhaus Moers (DE)
  • Lungenklinik Hemer (DE)
  • Lungenklinik Köln-Merheim (DE)
  • Krankenhaus Bethanien (DE)
Corresponding author
Wolf, Jürgen
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
122-127
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2225799198
Cited by
91
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
RET fusion, non-small cell lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, clinicopathological features, European patients, smoking status, TP53 mutation
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Rearrangement, Oncogene Proteins, Fusion, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review