Diminished efficacy of programmed death-(ligand)1 inhibition in STK11- and KEAP1-mutant lung adenocarcinoma is affected by KRAS mutation status
Open accessAbstract
Introduction STK11 and KEAP1 mutations (STK11 mutant [STK11 MUT] and KEAP1 MUT) are among the most often mutated genes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Although STK11 MUT has been associated with resistance to programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) inhibition in KRAS MUT LUAD, its impact on immunotherapy efficacy in KRAS wild-type (KRAS WT) LUAD is currently unknown. Whether KEAP1 MUT differentially affects outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibition in KRAS MUT and KRAS WT LUAD is also unknown.Methods Clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from September 2013 to September 2020 from patients with advanced LUAD at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital cohort and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/MD Anderson Cancer Center cohort. Clinical outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibition were analyzed according to KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 mutation status in two independent cohorts. The Cancer Genome Atlas transcriptomic data were interrogated to identify differences in tumor gene expression and tumor immune cell subsets, respectively, according to KRAS/STK11 and KRAS/KEAP1 comutation status.Results In the combined cohort (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital + Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/MD Anderson Cancer Center) of 1261 patients (median age = 61 y [range: 22-92], 708 women [56.1%], 1065 smokers [84.4%]), KRAS mutations were detected in 536 cases (42.5%), and deleterious STK11 and KEAP1 mutations were found in 20.6% (260 of 1261) and 19.2% (231 of 1202) of assessable cases, respectively. In each independent cohort and in the combined cohort, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations were associated with significantly worse progression-free (STK11 hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, p < 0.0001; KEAP1 HR = 2.05, p < 0.0001) and overall (STK11 HR = 2.09, p < 0.0001; KEAP1 HR = 2.24, p < 0.0001) survival to immunotherapy uniquely among KRAS MUT but not KRAS WT LUADs. Gene expression ontology and immune cell enrichment analyses revealed that the presence of STK11 or KEAP1 mutations results in distinct immunophenotypes in KRAS MUT, but not in KRAS WT, lung cancers.Conclusions STK11 and KEAP1 mutations confer worse outcomes to immunotherapy among patients with KRAS MUT but not among KRAS WT LUAD. Tumors harboring concurrent KRAS/STK11 and KRAS/KEAP1 mutations display distinct immune profiles in terms of gene expression and immune cell infiltration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a cohort of patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with anti-PD-(L)1, those with STK11 mutations had an overall response rate of 11.6% compared with 32.4% for patients with wild-type STK11.
“In a cohort of patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with anti–PD-(L)1, those with STK11 mutations had an overall response rate (ORR) of 11.6% compared with 32.4% for patients with wild-type STK11.”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Results section reports that, among KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas treated with PD-(L)1 inhibition, STK11 mutations were associated with a significantly worse overall response rate. Our copy does not state the claimed rates of 11.6% and 32.4%, so the numerical comparison cannot be verified from it (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredClinical data identify STK11 loss-of-function alterations as a driver of immune evasion and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in NSCLC tumors.
“This finding is consistent with clinical data that identified STK11 loss-of-function alterations as a driver of immune evasion and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in NSCLC tumors (1, 6).”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Results report worse responses and survival after checkpoint inhibition for STK11-mutant, KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, alongside reduced immune-related gene expression; they do not find the same treatment-outcome association in KRAS-wild-type tumors. The Discussion describes these as correlations requiring preclinical work to establish the mechanism, so the claim overgeneralizes to NSCLC tumors and calls STK11 alterations a causal driver more firmly than this clinical study supports. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn NSCLC, patients whose tumors have loss of STK11 have lower response rates to standard of care, including immune checkpoint antibodies such as anti-PD-1.
“In NSCLC, patients whose tumors have loss of STK11 have lower response rates to standard of care, including immune checkpoint antibodies such as anti–PD-1.”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Results section reports a lower response rate to immune checkpoint inhibition for STK11-mutant, KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, but not for KRAS-wild-type tumors. The Discussion also reports worse outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy, but does not establish lower response rates to standard-of-care treatments generally. The claim therefore extends the finding beyond the subgroup and outcome the paper supports. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSTK11-mutant tumors are characterized by lower T-cell infiltration than tumors wild-type for STK11.
“STK11-mutant tumors are characterized by lower T-cell infiltration (1, 7, 8), higher levels of immune-suppressive neutrophils (8), and low levels of antigen presentation (9, 10) compared with those wild-type for STK11, contributing to their immune evasive phenotype.”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Results section on cell-type enrichment reports more CD4+ effector memory cells in KRAS-mutant/STK11-wild-type lung adenocarcinomas than in KRAS-mutant/STK11-mutant tumors. It did not find that difference in KRAS-wild-type tumors, so the claim overgeneralizes the finding to STK11-mutant tumors regardless of KRAS status and to T cells broadly. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the same cohort, overall survival for STK11-mutant patients was 6.2 months compared with 17.3 months in patients with wild-type STK11.
“Overall survival in the same cohort for STK11-mutant patients was 6.2 months compared with 17.3 months in patients with wild-type STK11 (1).”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Results section reports shorter median overall survival with STK11 mutation in the combined cohort receiving PD-(L)1 inhibition, largely driven by patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Our copy does not give the claimed 6.2- versus 17.3-month figures, so it supports the direction of the comparison but not those values. The passage has no page number in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Tumors with loss-of-function mutations in STK11 respond poorly to immune checkpoint blockade, leading to shorter progression-free survival and overall survival.
“Tumors with loss-of-function mutations in STK11 respond poorly to immune checkpoint blockade, leading to shorter progression-free survival and overall survival in these patients (1, 5, 6).”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Results report poorer response and shorter progression-free and overall survival after immune checkpoint inhibition in STK11-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. However, the effect was largely driven by KRAS-mutant tumors; the paper's conclusion says it was not found in KRAS-wild-type tumors. The claim omits that important qualification. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSeveral studies have shown that loss of KEAP1 is also associated with immunotherapy resistance.
“Several studies have shown that loss of KEAP1 is also associated with immunotherapy resistance (1, 47).”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The Discussion identifies KEAP1 loss-of-function mutations as associated with resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. The Results and Discussion also report no such effect in KRAS-wild-type cases, a qualification the citing sentence omits. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSTK11/LKB1 mutations are associated with decreased responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade and poor overall prognosis.
“Inactivating mutations or loss of STK11/LKB1, which define one of the major genomic sub-groups of KRAS-mutant lung cancers1,19,62, are of particular interest because they are associated with decreased responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade9,63 and poor overall prognosis64.”
From LKB1 regulates JNK-dependent stress signaling and apoptotic dependency of KRAS-mutant lung cancers (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Several clinical reports have emphasized the role of KRAS comutation on the impact of STK11 loss on immune evasion.
“Several clinical reports have emphasized the role of KRAS comutation on the impact of STK11 loss on immune evasion (1, 6).”
From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
STK11, TP53 or CDKN2A/CDKN2B co-mutations are frequent in KRAS-mutant tumours, and KRAS-STK11 or KRAS-KEAP1 co-mutation patterns are associated with treatment resistance in preclinical models and poor outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy.
“co-mutations in the tumour-suppressor genes STK11, TP53 or CDKN2A/CDKN2B are frequently found in KRAS-mutant tumours35. Patients in the KRAS–STK11 co-mutation group can be subdivided into KEAP1-wild-type or KEAP1-mutant subgroups, and KEAP1 can also be co-mutated with KRAS in the absence of STK11 mutations; each of these co-mutation patterns is associated with resistance to treatment in”
From The current state of the art and future trends in RAS-targeted cancer therapies (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Clinical studies have shown that KRAS-mutant tumors with certain co-mutations, such as KEAP1 or STK11, are less responsive to certain therapeutic approaches, including anti-PD1 or KRASG12Ci.
“Clinical studies have also shown that KRAS-mutant tumors with certain co-mutations, such as KEAP1 or STK11, are less responsive to certain therapeutic approaches, including anti-PD1 (ref. 58) or KRASG12Ci (ref. 59).”
From Co-targeting SOS1 enhances the antitumor effects of KRASG12C inhibitors by addressing intrinsic and acquired resistance (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
In a combined cohort of 536 patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, both STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in the presence of a KRAS mutation were associated with poor response rates to anti-PD(L)1 inhibitors.
“In another recent combined cohort of 536 patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, both STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in the presence of a KRAS mutation were associated with poor response rates to anti-PD(L)1 inhibitors [74].”
From Drugging KRAS: Current perspectives and state-of-art review (2022) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 394
- Authors
- Ricciuti, B., Arbour, K. C., Lin, J. J., Vajdi, A., Vokes, N., Hong, L., Zhang, J., Tolstorukov, M. Y., Li, Y. Y., Spurr, L. F., Cherniack, A. D., Recondo, G., Lamberti, G., Wang, X., Venkatraman, D., Alessi, J. V., Vaz, V. R., Rizvi, H., Egger, J., Plodkowski, A. J., Khosrowjerdi, S., Digumarthy, S., Park, H., Vaz, N., Nishino, M., Sholl, L. M., Barbie, D., Altan, M., Heymach, J. V., Skoulidis, F., Gainor, J. F., Hellmann, M. D., & Awad, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Awad, Mark M.
- ORCID
- Ricciuti, Biagio
- Arbour, Kathryn C.
- Lin, Jessica J.
- Vajdi, Amir
- Vokes, Natalie
- Hong, Lingzhi
- Zhang, Jianjun
- Tolstorukov, Michael Y.
- Li, Yvonne Y.
- Spurr, Liam F.
- Cherniack, Andrew D.
- Recondo, Gonzalo
- Lamberti, Giuseppe
- Wang, Xinan
- Venkatraman, Deepti
- Alessi, Joao V.
- Vaz, Victor R.
- Rizvi, Hira
- Egger, Jacklynn
- Plodkowski, Andrew J.
- Khosrowjerdi, Sara
- Digumarthy, Subba
- Park, Hyesun
- Nishino, Mizuki
- Sholl, Lynette M.
- Barbie, David
- Altan, Mehmet
- Heymach, John V.
- Skoulidis, Ferdinandos
- Gainor, Justin F.
- Hellmann, Matthew D.
- Awad, Mark M.
- Venue
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-410
- ISSN
- 1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10980559
- OpenAlex
- W3136351248
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 22.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- American Cancer Society
- Johnson and Johnson
- Mark Foundation For Cancer Research
- National Cancer Institute
- Merck
- Conquer Cancer Foundation
- Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
- AstraZeneca
- AbbVie
- Genentech
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Gilead Sciences
- Eli Lilly and Company (PCT/US2015/062208)
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
- Pfizer
- Neos Therapeutics
- Novartis
- Jounce Therapeutics
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Roche (R01CA203636, U01CA209414)
- Amgen
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Keywords
- lung adenocarcinoma, STK11 mutation, KEAP1 mutation, KRAS mutation, PD-L1 blockade, immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance, immunotherapy efficacy, tumor immune microenvironment, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, tumor suppressor, progression-free survival, overall survival, predictive biomarkers, cancer gene expression, tumor mutational burden
- MeSH terms
- Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1, Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Ligands, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), NF-E2-Related Factor 2, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review