The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications
Abstract
Abstract Transport planning is gradually shifting targets towards modifying the pedestrian streetscapes that favor walking and enhance urban sustainability. We cannot be optimistic about walkability on condition that walkable streets are not evenly distributed within urban settings. Auditing the street walkability and associated social inequalities in developing countries should provide critical implications for transport planning. This paper identifies the most common indicators in existing indicator classification frameworks based on word frequency; and then establishes an indicator classification system (connectivity, accessibility, suitability, serviceability, and perceptibility) through expert panel evaluation for auditing street walkability in China. Using a case of Hangzhou metropolitan area, a set of 13 indicators are first selected by referring to the established indicator classification system and then aggregated into an integrated walkability index (IWI) through the catastrophe theory (CT) model after appropriate data treatment (standardization, normalization and correlation calculation). Camera signaling data are employed to validate the developed IWI. Results show that IWI is efficient to audit street walkability. IWI presents great heterogeneity at segment level. In general, higher walkability is observed in streets across the central and western areas. Walkability profiles of the segments are further produced by the clustering approach and the categorized groups can inform more targeted planning options. Spatial regression is finally utilized to quantify the associations between community socio-demographics and neighborhood IWI at two levels. We discover that lower neighborhood walkability would be observed in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. These results suggest that significant social inequalities in street walkability should exist across the communities within Hangzhou metropolitan area. The developed IWI not only brings a standardized measurement of street walkability in the field of transport planning, but also paves the way for addressing the social inequalities in street design across various jurisdictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511597237 · Cited by 4,322
Built Environment Correlates of Walking: A Review
SAELENS, B. E., & HANDY, S. L. (2008) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31817c67a4 · Cited by 1,912
Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b200029 · Cited by 1,581
Li, Y., Xiao, L., Ye, Y., Xu, W., & Law, A. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.008 · Cited by 144
Cited by
The 15-minute city: Urban planning and design efforts toward creating sustainable neighborhoods
Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Sharifi, A., & Sadeghi, A. (2023) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.104101 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Transport Geography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 62-76
- ISSN
- 0966-6923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901564266
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
- The paper
- Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2019). Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.