Cited by 1,581Urban Design and Spatial AnalysisUrban Transport and AccessibilityEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement

Hillier, B, Penn, A, Hanson, J, Grajewski, T, Xu, J·1993·Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Abstract

Existing theories relating patterns of pedestrian and vehicular movement to urban form characterise the problem in terms of flows to and from 'attractor' land uses. This paper contains evidence in support of a new 'configurational' paradigm in which a primary property of the form of the urban grid is to privilege certain spaces over others for through movement. In this way it is suggested that the configuration of the urban grid itself is the main generator of patterns of movement. Retail land uses are then located to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the passing trade and may well act as multipliers on the basic pattern of 'natural movement' generated by the grid configuration. The configurational correlates of movement patterns are found to be measures of global properties of the grid with the 'space syntax' measure of 'integration' consistently found to be the most important. This has clear implications for urban design suggesting that if we wish to design for well used urban space, then it is not the local properties of a space that are important in the main but its configurational relations to the larger urban system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/b200029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The structure (or geometry) of an artifact is determined by the function it is meant to serve.

    “'Form follows function' is an influential design principle often followed by architects; the structure (or geometry) of an artifact is determined by the function it is meant to serve [162][163][164] .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [164]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
Published
1993
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
29-66
ISSN
  • 0265-8135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3417
OpenAlex
W1979973762
Cited by
1,581
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 43
FWCI
18.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment and Planning B Planning and Design (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
pedestrian movement, space syntax, integration, retail land use, through movements, urban form, movement patterns, urban design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review