Cited by 44Problem and Project Based LearningInnovations in Medical EducationBiomedical and Engineering Education

Acquisition of knowledge, generic skills and attitudes through problem-based learning: Student perspectives in a hybrid curriculum

Open access
Hande, S., Mohammed, C.A., Komattil, R.·2015·Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences

Abstract

Objective To investigate students' perceptions of problem-based learning in the acquisition of relevant knowledge, generic skills and attitudes in a setting where this is a vital component of the medical undergraduate hybrid curriculum. Methods 464 undergraduate medical students in four consecutive batches (two in the first year and two in the second year of the medicine programme) at Melaka Manipal Medical College were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. A pre-validated questionnaire with 15 items classified into three domains addressing acquisition of knowledge, generic skills and attitudes was developed and administered to all students, who responded on a five-point Likert scale. Results Problem-based learning improved the students' acquisition of knowledge, generic skills and attitudes, with positive correlations (0.451–0.72) between scores in all three domains. Problem-based learning affected not only typical competence in interpersonal and cognitive domains but also more general work-related skills considered important for success in professional practice. Conclusions Problem-based learning in small groups provided students with a favourable, safe environment for developing the necessary skills and attitudes. This study not only fills a gap but also shows the advantages of problem-based learning as perceived by students in a hybrid medical curriculum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.01.008

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hande, S., Mohammed, C. A., & Komattil, R.
Affiliations
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Corresponding author
Hande, S.
Venue
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
21-25
ISSN
1658-3612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081913955
Cited by
44
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biomedical and Engineering Education
Keywords
problem-based learning, hybrid curriculum, undergraduate medical education, transferable skills, attitudes, knowledge acquisition, student perceptions, small group learning, employability skills, social skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review