Cited by 49School Choice and PerformanceEducational Assessment and ImprovementEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

The academic impact of multi-track year-round school calendars: A response to school overcrowding

Graves, Jennifer·2010·Journal of Urban Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 49

Authors
Graves, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Graves, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of Urban Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
378-391
ISSN
0094-1190 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094460374
Cited by
49
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
school overcrowding, academic performance, standardized test scores, school finance, school construction costs, California

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review