A field study of rental market discrimination across origins in France
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Housing discrimination can lead to a spatial mismatch whereby immigrants have poorer access to good jobs and high quality schools, longer commutes to work, inadequate access to medical care, and resultant poorer health outcomes.
“Housing discrimination can also lead to a spatial mismatch whereby immigrants have poorer access to good jobs and high quality schools, longer commutes to work, inadequate access to medical care, and resultant poorer health outcomes (Acolin et al. 2016, Ayón 2015).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Acolin et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Acolin, A., Bostic, R., & Painter, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bostic, Raphael
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 49-63
- ISSN
- 0094-1190 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2515621492
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Urban Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Keywords
- housing discrimination, name-based discrimination, search costs, immigrant share
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
