The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: Technical barrier or rhetorical excuse?
Open accessAbstract
A consensus has long existed within the electric utility sector of the United States that renewable electricity generators such as wind and solar are unreliable and intermittent to a degree that they will never be able to contribute significantly to electric utility supply or provide baseload power. This paper asks three interconnected questions: 1. What do energy experts really think about renewables in the United States? 2. To what degree are conventional baseload units reliable? 3. Is intermittency a justifiable reason to reject renewable electricity resources?To provide at least a few answers, the author conducted 62 formal, semi-structured interviews at 45 different institutions including electric utilities, regulatory agencies, interest groups, energy systems manufacturers, nonprofit organizations, energy consulting firms, universities, national laboratories, and state institutions in the United States. In addition, an extensive literature review of government reports, technical briefs, and journal articles was conducted to understand how other countries have dealt with (or failed to deal with) the intermittent nature of renewable resources around the world. It was concluded that the intermittency of renewables can be predicted, managed, and mitigated, and that the current technical barriers are mainly due to the social, political, and practical inertia of the traditional electricity generation system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2016) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.293 · Cited by 1,112
Sinsel, S. R., Riemke, R. L., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.147 · Cited by 964
Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Cameron, M. A., & Frew, B. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510028112 · Cited by 478
A critical review of the integration of renewable energy sources with various technologies
Erdiwansyah, Mahidin, Husin, H., Nasaruddin, Zaki, M., & Muhibbuddin (2021) · Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems · doi:10.1186/s41601-021-00181-3 · Cited by 473
Wolsink, M. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Sovacool, B. K.
- Venue
- Utilities Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 288-296
- ISSN
- 0957-1787 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009790852
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: Technical barrier or rhetorical excuse? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jup.2008.07.001
- The paper
- Sovacool, B. K. (2009). The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: Technical barrier or rhetorical excuse? Utilities Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2008.07.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.