CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources

Wolsink, Maarten·2012·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Ackermann, 2001, Distributed generation: a definition, Electric Power Systems Research, 57, 195, 10.1016/S0378-7796(01)00101-8 · DOI
  2. Alanne, 2006, Distributed energy generation and sustainable development, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, 539, 10.1016/j.rser.2004.11.004 · DOI
  3. Pepermans, 2005, Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues, Energy Policy, 33, 787, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.004 · DOI
  4. Charles, 2009, Renewables test IQ of the grid, Science, 324, 172, 10.1126/science.324.5924.172 · DOI
  5. Lidula, 2011, Microgrids research: a review of experimental microgrids and test systems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 186, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.041 · DOI
  6. Thiam, 2010, Renewable decentralized in developing countries: appraisal from microgrids project in Senegal, Renewable Energy, 35, 1615, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.01.015 · DOI
  7. Alvial-Palavicino, 2011, A methodology for community engagement in the introduction of renewable based smart microgrid, Energy for Sustainable Development, 15, 314, 10.1016/j.esd.2011.06.007 · DOI
  8. Siddiqui, 2001, Customer adoption of small-scale on-site power, vol. 1, 413
  9. Jiayi, 2008, A review on distributed energy resources and MicroGrid, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 2472, 10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.004 · DOI
  10. Marris, 2008, Upgrading the grid, Nature, 454, 570, 10.1038/454570a · DOI
  11. Hledik, 2009, How green is the smart grid?, The Electricity Journal, 22, 29, 10.1016/j.tej.2009.03.001 · DOI
  12. Asmus, 2010, Microgrids, virtual power plants and our distributed energy future, The Electricity Journal, 23, 72, 10.1016/j.tej.2010.11.001 · DOI
  13. Abu-Sharkh, 2006, Can microgrids make a major contribution to UK energy supply?, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, 78, 10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.013 · DOI
  14. Hammons, 2008, Integrating renewable energy sources into European grids, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 30, 462, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2008.04.010 · DOI
  15. Coll-Mayor, 2007, Future intelligent power grids: analysis of the vision in the European Union and the United States, Energy Policy, 35, 2453, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.001 · DOI
  16. Wissner, 2011, The smart grid—a saucerful of secrets?, Applied Energy, 88, 2509, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.042 · DOI
  17. Roscoe, 2010, Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real-time electricity pricing and demand response, IET Renewable Power Generation, 4, 369, 10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0212 · DOI
  18. Darby, 2010, Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement?, Building Research and Information, 38, 442, 10.1080/09613218.2010.492660 · DOI
  19. Guy, 2006, Designing urban knowledge: competing perspectives on energy and buildings, Environment and Planning C, 24, 645, 10.1068/c0607j · DOI
  20. Unruh, 2002, Escaping carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 30, 317, 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ostergaard, 2009, Reviewing optimisation criteria for energy systems analyses of renewable energy integration, Energy, 34, 1236, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.004 · DOI
  22. Van der Veen, 2009, The impact of microgeneration upon the Dutch balancing market, Energy Policy, 37, 2788, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.015 · DOI
  23. Jarventausta, 2010, Smart grid power system control in distributed generation environment, Annual Reviews in Control, 34, 277, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.08.005 · DOI
  24. Rohracher, 2003, The role of users in the social shaping of environmental technologies, Innovation, 16, 177
  25. Brown, 2010, Some characteristics of emerging distribution systems considering the smart grid initiative, Electricity Journal, 23, 64, 10.1016/j.tej.2010.05.005 · DOI
  26. Wolsink, 1987, Wind power for the electricity supply of houses The Netherlands, Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 2, 195, 10.1007/BF02497872 · DOI
  27. Kempton, 2005, Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: calculating capacity and net revenue, Journal of Power Sources, 144, 268, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.025 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Green, 2011, The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distributed networks: a review and outlook, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 544, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.08.015 · DOI
  29. Srivastava, 2010, The challenges and policy options for integrated plug-in hybrid electric vehicle into the electric grid, Electricity Journal, 23, 21, 10.1016/j.tej.2010.03.004 · DOI
  30. Tomić, 2007, Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support, Journal of Power Sources, 168, 459, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Sovacool, 2009, Beyond batteries: an examination of the benefits and barriers to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition, Energy Policy, 37, 1095, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lund, 2008, Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G, Energy Policy, 36, 3578, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.007 · DOI
  33. Ekman, 2011, On the synergy between large electric vehicle fleet and high wind penetration—an analysis of the Danish case, Renewable Energy, 36, 546, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.001 · DOI
  34. Andersen, 2009, Integrating private transport into renewable energy policy: the strategy of creating intelligent recharging grids for electric vehicles, Energy Policy, 37, 2481, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.032 · DOI
  35. Thelen, 1999, Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Heiman, 2004, Power to the people: electric utility restructuring and the commitment to renewable energy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 94, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401006.x · DOI
  37. Sauter, 2007, Strategies for the deployment of micro-generation: implications for social acceptance, Energy Policy, 35, 2770, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.006 · DOI
  38. Baptiste, 2004, Difficultés liées à l‘intégration de la gestion des resources dans le pilotage des operations, Journal Europeen des Systems Automases, 38, 773
  39. Jäger-Waldau, 2007, Photovaltics and renewable energies in Europe, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1414, 10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.001 · DOI
  40. Lewis, 2007, Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms, Energy Policy, 35, 1844, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.005 · DOI
  41. Wolsink, 1996, Dutch wind power policy Stagnating implementation of renewables, Energy Policy, 24, 1079, 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)80002-5 · DOI
  42. Breukers, 2007, Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: institutional capacity building for Ecological Modernisation, Environmental Politics, 16, 92, 10.1080/09644010601073838 · DOI
  43. Marques, 2011, Drivers promoting renewable energy: a dynamic panel approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 1601, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.048 · DOI
  44. Toke, 2008, Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the differences?, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 1129, 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021 · DOI
  45. Fischlein, 2010, Policy stakeholders and deployment of wind power in the sub-national context: a comparison of four U.S. states, Energy Policy, 38, 4429, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.073 · DOI
  46. Wolsink, 2010, Social acceptance of contested environmental policy infrastructure: comparing renewable energy, water management, and waste facilities, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 302, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.001 · DOI
  47. Wüstenhagen, 2007, Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept, Energy Policy, 35, 2683, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001 · DOI
  48. Breukers, 2007, Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison, Energy Policy, 35, 2737, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004 · DOI
  49. Sovacool, 2008, Renewable energy: economically sound, politically difficult, Electricity Journal, 21, 18, 10.1016/j.tej.2008.05.009 · DOI
  50. Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations, Research Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6 · DOI
  51. Sovacool, 2009, The intermittency of wind, solar, and renewable electricity generators: technical barrier or rhetorical excuse?, Utilities Policy, 17, 288, 10.1016/j.jup.2008.07.001 · DOI
  52. Lauber, 2004, REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised Community framework, Energy Policy, 32, 1405, 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00108-3 · DOI
  53. Wolsink, 2010, Contrasting the core beliefs regarding the effective implementation of wind power. An international study of stakeholder perspectives, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53, 535, 10.1080/09640561003633581 · DOI
  54. Dinçer, 2000, Renewable energy and sustainable development: a critical review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4, 157, 10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8 · DOI
  55. Omer, 2008, Green energies and the environment, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 1789, 10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.009 · DOI
  56. Bagliani, 2010, Territory and energy sustainability: the challenge of renewable energy sources, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53, 457, 10.1080/09640561003694336 · DOI
  57. Makovich, 2011, The smart grid separating perception from reality, Issues in Science and Technology, 27, 61
  58. Walker, 2008, Community renewable energy: what should it mean?, Energy Policy, 36, 497, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  59. Wolsink, 2007, Wind power implementation. The nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1188, 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005 · DOI
  60. Zografos, 2009, The politics of landscape value: a case study of wind farm conflict in rural Catalonia, Environment and Planning A, 41, 1726, 10.1068/a41208 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Terrados, 2009, Proposal for a combined methodology for renewable energy planning. Application to a Spanish region, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2022, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.025 · DOI
  62. Aitken, 2010, Wind power and community benefits: challenges and opportunities, Energy Policy, 38, 6066, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.062 · DOI
  63. Walker, 2010, Trust community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy, Energy Policy, 38, 2655, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 · DOI
  64. Mendonça, 2009, Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: lessons from Denmark and the United States, Policy and Society, 27, 379, 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.01.007 · DOI
  65. Twigger-Ross, 1996, Place and identity processes, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205, 10.1006/jevp.1996.0017 · DOI
  66. Alkon, 2004, Place, stories, and consequences—heritage narratives and the control of erosion on Lake County, California, vineyards, Organization & Environment, 17, 145, 10.1177/1086026604264881 · DOI
  67. Cowell, 2011, Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 539, 10.1080/09640568.2010.521047 · DOI
  68. Manzo, 2006, Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 335, 10.1177/0885412205286160 · DOI
  69. Devine-Wright, 2009, Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426, 10.1002/casp.1004 · DOI
  70. Lothian, 1999, Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 177, 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5 · DOI
  71. Pasqualetti, 2011, Opposing wind energy landscapes: a search for common cause, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101, 907, 10.1080/00045608.2011.568879 · DOI
  72. Chiabrando, 2009, The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2441, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.008 · DOI
  73. Thayer, 1987, Altamont: public perceptions of a wind energy landscape, Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 379, 10.1016/0169-2046(87)90051-X · DOI
  74. Devine-Wright, 2010, Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 271, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008 · DOI
  75. Phadke, 2010, Steel forests or smoke stacks: the politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy, Environmental Politics, 19, 1, 10.1080/09644010903396051 · DOI
  76. Wolsink, 2010, Near-shore wind power. Protected seascapes, environmentalist‘s attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective, Land Use Policy, 27, 195, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004 · DOI
  77. Economou, 2011, Photovoltaic systems in school units of Greece and their consequences, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 881, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.028 · DOI
  78. Mostofi, 2011, Institutional scale operational symbiosis of photovoltaic and cogeneration energy systems, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 8, 31, 10.1007/BF03326193 · DOI
  79. Riddington, 2010, Assessing the economic impact of wind farms on tourism in Scotland: GIS, surveys and policy outcomes, International Journal of Tourism Research, 12, 237, 10.1002/jtr.750 · DOI
  80. Frantál, 2011, Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech experience, Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 499, 10.1016/j.annals.2010.10.007 · DOI
  81. Garud, 2003, Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32, 277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2 · DOI
  82. Mumford, 2010, Consumer engagement in alternative energy—can the regulators and suppliers be trusted?, Energy Policy, 38, 2664, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.054 · DOI
  83. Wolsink, 2004, Policy beliefs in spatial decisions: contrasting core beliefs concerning space making for waste infrastructure, Urban Studies, 41, 2669, 10.1080/0042098042000294619 · DOI
  84. Houthakker, 1951, Electricity tariffs in theory and practice, Economic Journal, 61, 1, 10.2307/2226608 · DOI
  85. Zarnikau, 2003, Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency, Energy Policy, 31, 1661, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00232-X · DOI
  86. Ek, 2005, Public private attitudes towards green electricity: the case of Swedish wind power, Energy Policy, 33, 1677, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005 · DOI
  87. Zografakis, 2010, Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 1088, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.009 · DOI
  88. Kotchen, 2007, Private provision of environmental public goods: household participation in green-electricity programs, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, 1, 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.06.003 · DOI
  89. Press, 2009, Constraints on sustainable energy consumption: market system and public policy challenges and opportunities, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 102, 10.1509/jppm.28.1.102 · DOI
  90. Mewton, 2011, Green power voluntary purchases: price elasticity and policy analysis, Energy Policy, 39, 377, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.013 · DOI
  91. Van Rooijen, 2006, Green electricity policies in the Netherlands: an analysis of policy decisions, Energy Policy, 34, 60, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.002 · DOI
  92. Wüstenhagen, 2006, Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand, Energy Policy, 34, 1681, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.07.013 · DOI
  93. Mitchell, 2006, Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany Energy Policy, Energy Policy, 34, 297, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.004 · DOI
  94. Bürer, 2009, Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist‘s best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors, Energy Policy, 37, 4997, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.071 · DOI
  95. Ostrom, 1999, Coping with tragedies of the commons, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493 · DOI
  96. Ostrom, 2010, A long polycentric journey, Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 1, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.090808.123259 · DOI
  97. Guille, 2009, A conceptual framework for the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation, Energy Policy, 37, 4379, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Ostrom, 1986, An agenda for the study of institutions, Public Choice, 48, 3, 10.1007/BF00239556 · DOI
  99. Ostrom, 1998, A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action, American Political Science Review, 92, 1, 10.2307/2585925 · DOI
  100. DeGroff, 2010, Green environment: decision-making and power utility optimization towards smart-grid option, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 1, 32, 10.4236/sgre.2010.11005 · DOI
  101. Vermeylen, 2010, Resource rights and the evolution of renewable energy technologies, Renewable Energy, 35, 2399, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.017 · DOI
  102. Gómez García, 2010, Rural electrification systems based on renewable energy: the social dimensions of an innovative technology, Technology in Society, 32, 303, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.007 · DOI
  103. Acheson, 2006, Institutional failure in resource management, Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 117, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123238 · DOI
  104. Walker, 2011, The role for ‘community’ in carbon Governance, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 2, 777, 10.1002/wcc.137 · DOI
  105. Henning, 2008, Temporal landscapes for the public good: negotiating solar collectors among ancient remains, Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 27, 10.1080/14649360701789568 · DOI
  106. Ricci, 2010, Engaging the public on paths to sustainable energy: who has to trust whom?, Energy Policy, 38, 2633, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.038 · DOI
  107. Bulkeley, 2005, Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks, Political Geography, 8, 875, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002 · DOI
  108. Jacobsson, 2000, The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research, Energy Policy, 2000, 625, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0 · DOI
  109. Ostrom, 2010, Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change, Global Environmental Change, 20, 550, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Wolsink, M.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
822-835
ISSN
1364-0321
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006
Cited by
469
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review