Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 901

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Wolf, J. Stuart, Bennett, Carol J., Dmochowski, Roger R., Hollenbeck, Brent K., Pearle, Margaret S., Schaeffer, Anthony J.·2008·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is the periprocedural systemic administration of an antimicrobial agent intended to reduce the risk of postprocedural local and systemic infections. The AUA convened a BPP Panel to formulate recommendations on the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis during urologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recommendations are based on a review of the literature and the Panel members' expert opinions. RESULTS: The potential benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis is determined by patient factors, procedure factors, and the potential morbidity of infection. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended only when the potential benefit outweighs the risks and anticipated costs (including expense of agent and administration, risk of allergic reactions or other adverse effects, and induction of bacterial resistance). The prophylactic agent should be effective against organisms characteristic of the operative site. Cost, convenience, and safety of the agent also should be considered. The duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis should extend throughout the period when bacterial invasion is facilitated and/or likely to establish an infection. Prophylaxis should begin within 60 minutes of the surgical incision (120 minutes for intravenous fluoroquinolines and vancomycin) and generally should be discontinued within 24 hours. The AHA no longer recommends antimicrobial prophylaxis for genitourinary surgery solely to prevent infectious endocarditis. Justifications and recommendations for specific antimicrobial prophylactic regimens for specific categories of urologic procedures are provided. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations provided in this document, including specific indications and agents enumerated in the Tables, can assist urologists in the appropriate use of periprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 901

Metadata

Authors
Wolf, J. S., Bennett, C. J., Dmochowski, R. R., Hollenbeck, B. K., Pearle, M. S., & Schaeffer, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2008-04
Volume
179
Issue
4
Pages
1379-1390
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2050346837
Cited by
901
References
0
FWCI
26.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068
The paper
Wolf, J. S., Bennett, C. J., Dmochowski, R. R., Hollenbeck, B. K., Pearle, M. S., & Schaeffer, A. J. (2008). Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.