Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Refractory Idiopathic Urge Urinary Incontinence and Botulinum A Injection

Open access
Brubaker, Linda, Richter, Holly E., Visco, Anthony, Mahajan, Sangeeta, Nygaard, Ingrid, Braun, Thomas M., Barber, Matthew D., Menefee, Shawn, Schaffer, Joseph, Weber, Anne M., Wei, John, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network·2008·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared 200 U intradetrusor botulinum toxin A vs placebo in women with refractory idiopathic urge incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board approved, multicenter registered trial randomized women with refractory urge incontinence, detrusor overactivity incontinence and 6 or greater urge incontinence episodes in 3 days to botulinum toxin A or placebo at a 2:1 ratio. Refractory was defined as inadequate symptom control after 2 or more attempts at pharmacotherapy and 1 or more other first line therapies for detrusor overactivity incontinence. The primary outcome measure was time to failure, as evidenced by a Patient Global Impression of Improvement score of 4 or greater at least 2 months after injection, or changes in treatment (initiation or increase) at any time after injection. Safety data, including increased post-void residual volume, defined as more than 200 ml irrespective of symptoms, was obtained at specified time points. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of the women who received botulinum toxin A had a clinical response based on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The median duration of their responses was 373 days, significantly longer than the 62 days or less for placebo (p <0.0001). In the botulinum toxin A group increased post-void residual urine (12 of 28 women or 43%) and urinary tract infection in those with increased post-void residual urine (9 of 12 or 75%) exceeded expected ranges. Further injections were stopped after 43 patients were randomized, including 28 to botulinum toxin A and 15 to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Local injection of 200 U botulinum toxin A was an effective and durable treatment for refractory overactive bladder. However, a transient post-void residual urine increase was experienced in 43% of patients. Botulinum toxin A for idiopathic overactive bladder is still under investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.028

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Brubaker, L., Richter, H. E., Visco, A., Mahajan, S., Nygaard, I., Braun, T. M., Barber, M. D., Menefee, S., Schaffer, J., Weber, A. M., Wei, J., & Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2008-07
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
217-222
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2141005094
Cited by
328
References
2
FWCI
29.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refractory Idiopathic Urge Urinary Incontinence and Botulinum A Injection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.028
The paper
Brubaker, L., Richter, H. E., Visco, A., Mahajan, S., Nygaard, I., Braun, T. M., Barber, M. D., Menefee, S., Schaffer, J., Weber, A. M., Wei, J., & Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. (2008). Refractory Idiopathic Urge Urinary Incontinence and Botulinum A Injection. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.