The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Early Continence After Reconstruction of the Periprostatic Tissues in Patients Undergoing Computer Assisted (Robotic) Prostatectomy: Results of a 2 Group Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
PURPOSE: Several case series have shown that reconstruction of the anterior or posterior periprostatic tissues facilitates early return of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. We conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing early continence rates in patients undergoing urethrovesical anastomosis with or without periprostatic reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 116 consecutive patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy performed by 1 of 2 experienced surgeons were randomized to single (without periprostatic reconstruction) or double layer (with periprostatic tissue reconstruction) urethrovesical anastomosis. Urinary loss was measured by pad weight at 1, 2, 7 and 30 days after catheter removal. Patients and data gatherers were blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS: There were 57 patients randomized to the single and 59 to the double layer anastomosis group. All patients completed the study and followup. Using the conventional definition of urinary continence (0 to 1 pads daily) 26% and 34%, 49% and 46%, 51% and 54%, and 74% and 80% of patients undergoing single layer or double layer anastomoses were continent at 1, 2, 7 and 30 days, respectively (p >0.1). Of the patients in the 2 groups 7% and 15%, 14% and 14%, 16% and 20%, and 47% and 42% had no urinary leakage (0 gm or 0 pads daily) at these intervals, respectively (p >0.1). In each group 1 patient required prolonged catheterization because of cystographic evidence of anastomotic leakage. There were no other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Early urinary continence rates were high in patients undergoing single or double layer urethrovesical anastomosis. We found no improvement in early continence rates with reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 · Cited by 2,755
Moher, D. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 · Cited by 2,545
Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials
POCOCK, S. J. (1977) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/64.2.191 · Cited by 1,831
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1 · Cited by 523
Cited by
Boutron, I., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT NPT Group* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m17-0046 · Cited by 1,538
Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Rosen, R. C., Artibani, W., Carroll, P. R., Costello, A., Menon, M., Montorsi, F., Patel, V. R., Stolzenburg, J.-U., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045 · Cited by 1,300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Menon, M., Muhletaler, F., Campos, M., & Peabody, J. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1018-1023
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2006984062
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Early Continence After Reconstruction of the Periprostatic Tissues in Patients Undergoing Computer Assisted (Robotic) Prostatectomy: Results of a 2 Group Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.046
- The paper
- Menon, M., Muhletaler, F., Campos, M., & Peabody, J. O. (2008). Assessment of Early Continence After Reconstruction of the Periprostatic Tissues in Patients Undergoing Computer Assisted (Robotic) Prostatectomy: Results of a 2 Group Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.