Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Early Continence After Reconstruction of the Periprostatic Tissues in Patients Undergoing Computer Assisted (Robotic) Prostatectomy: Results of a 2 Group Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

Menon, Mani, Muhletaler, Fred, Campos, Miguel, Peabody, James O.·2008·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several case series have shown that reconstruction of the anterior or posterior periprostatic tissues facilitates early return of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. We conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing early continence rates in patients undergoing urethrovesical anastomosis with or without periprostatic reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 116 consecutive patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy performed by 1 of 2 experienced surgeons were randomized to single (without periprostatic reconstruction) or double layer (with periprostatic tissue reconstruction) urethrovesical anastomosis. Urinary loss was measured by pad weight at 1, 2, 7 and 30 days after catheter removal. Patients and data gatherers were blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS: There were 57 patients randomized to the single and 59 to the double layer anastomosis group. All patients completed the study and followup. Using the conventional definition of urinary continence (0 to 1 pads daily) 26% and 34%, 49% and 46%, 51% and 54%, and 74% and 80% of patients undergoing single layer or double layer anastomoses were continent at 1, 2, 7 and 30 days, respectively (p >0.1). Of the patients in the 2 groups 7% and 15%, 14% and 14%, 16% and 20%, and 47% and 42% had no urinary leakage (0 gm or 0 pads daily) at these intervals, respectively (p >0.1). In each group 1 patient required prolonged catheterization because of cystographic evidence of anastomotic leakage. There were no other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Early urinary continence rates were high in patients undergoing single or double layer urethrovesical anastomosis. We found no improvement in early continence rates with reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.046

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Menon, M., Muhletaler, F., Campos, M., & Peabody, J. O.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2008-09
Volume
180
Issue
3
Pages
1018-1023
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2006984062
Cited by
227
References
5
FWCI
21.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Early Continence After Reconstruction of the Periprostatic Tissues in Patients Undergoing Computer Assisted (Robotic) Prostatectomy: Results of a 2 Group Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.046
The paper
Menon, M., Muhletaler, F., Campos, M., & Peabody, J. O. (2008). Assessment of Early Continence After Reconstruction of the Periprostatic Tissues in Patients Undergoing Computer Assisted (Robotic) Prostatectomy: Results of a 2 Group Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.