Cited by 34Connective Tissue Growth Factor ResearchProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchBone and Dental Protein Studies

Extracellular Matrix Associated Protein CYR61 is Linked to Prostate Cancer Development

Open access
D'Antonio, Katherine B., Toubaji, Antoun, Albadine, Roula, Mondul, Alison M., Platz, Elizabeth A., Netto, George J., Getzenberg, Robert H.·2010·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The cancer cell microenvironment includes complex interactions between the cell and the extracellular matrix. Expression of the CCN family of extracellular matrix associated proteins is often modified in disease states. Depending on cancer type these changes are linked with enhanced or inhibited tumor growth. We characterized Cyr61 in prostate cancer. Cyr61 is an integrin binding matricellular protein with altered expression in many cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cyr61 expression in prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal tissues was evaluated by microarray analysis, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and tissue microarray. Immunoblots were analyzed to assess endogenous protein expression in prostate cancer cell lines. RESULTS: On genomic analysis Cyr61 up-regulation was observed in prostate cancer tissue and in normal prostate tissue adjacent to tumor vs that in prostate donor tissue. In 174 matched tumors and normal prostate tissues adjacent to tumor tissue microarray revealed significantly up-regulated Cyr61 protein expression in cancer tissue vs normal prostate tissue adjacent to tumor. Also, increased Cyr61 expression correlated with Gleason sum 8 or greater cancer. Staining in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was moderately up-regulated vs that in normal prostate tissue adjacent to tumor but generally less intense than in carcinoma tissue. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the correlation with more advanced disease, the strong association between Cyr61 expression and prostate cancer supports the potential usefulness of Cyr61 as a novel biomarker for prostate cancer. This warrants further analysis to determine the mechanisms by which Cyr61 may contribute to prostate cancer development and progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CCN1 expression significantly correlates with stage, tumor size, lymph node positivity, and poor prognosis in several cancers, including breast cancer, prostate cancer, glioma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma.

    “The clinical relevance of these observations is supported by the finding of a significant correlation between CCN1 expression and the stage, tumor size, lymph node positivity, and poor prognosis in several cancers, including breast cancer [142,145–148], prostate cancer [149], glioma [150], gastric adenocarcinoma [151], and squamous cell carcinoma [143].”

    From CCN1/CYR61: the very model of a modern matricellular protein (2011) · cites this paper as [149]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Antonio, K. B., Toubaji, A., Albadine, R., Mondul, A. M., Platz, E. A., Netto, G. J., & Getzenberg, R. H.
Affiliations
  • The Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Getzenberg, Robert H.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2010-04
Volume
183
Issue
4
Pages
1604-1610
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2110768886
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connective Tissue Growth Factor Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone and Dental Protein Studies
Keywords
CYR61, CCN family proteins, extracellular matrix, prostate cancer, matricellular proteins, integrin binding, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Gleason score, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, tumor markers, tumor microenvironment, gene expression
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Microarray Analysis, Cysteine-Rich Protein 61

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review