The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: More than 1 million prostate biopsies are performed annually among Medicare beneficiaries. We determined the risk of serious complications requiring hospitalization. We hypothesized that with emerging multidrug resistant organisms there may be an increasing risk of infectious complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 5% random sample of Medicare participants in SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) regions from 1991 to 2007 we compared 30-day hospitalization rates and ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes for admissions between 17,472 men who underwent prostate biopsy and a random sample of 134,977 controls. Multivariate logistic and Poisson regression were used to examine the risk and predictors of serious infectious and noninfectious complications with time. RESULTS: The 30-day hospitalization rate was 6.9% within 30 days of prostate biopsy, which was substantially higher than the 2.7% in the control population. After adjusting for age, race, SEER region, year and comorbidities prostate biopsy was associated with a 2.65-fold (95% CI 2.47-2.84) increased risk of hospitalization within 30 days compared to the control population (p <0.0001). The risk of infectious complications requiring hospitalization after biopsy was significantly greater in more recent years (p(trend) = 0.001). Among men undergoing biopsy, later year, nonwhite race and higher comorbidity scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hospitalization within 30 days of prostate biopsy was significantly higher than in a control population. Infectious complications after prostate biopsy have increased in recent years while the rate of serious noninfectious complications is relatively stable. Careful patient selection for prostate biopsy is essential to minimize the potential harms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
Romano, P. S., Roos, L. L., & Jollis, J. G. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 · Cited by 1,717
Cited by
Ström, P., Kartasalo, K., Olsson, H., Solorzano, L., Delahunt, B., Berney, D. M., Bostwick, D. G., Evans, A. J., Grignon, D. J., Humphrey, P. A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30738-7 · Cited by 620
Parekh, D. J., Punnen, S., Sjoberg, D. D., Asroff, S. W., Bailen, J. L., Cochran, J. S., Concepcion, R., David, R. D., Deck, K. B., Dumbadze, I., et al. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.021 · Cited by 414
Screening for Prostate Cancer With the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test: A Review of Current Evidence
Hayes, J. H., & Barry, M. J. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.2085 · Cited by 361
Shao, W., Vesal, S., Soerensen, S. J. C., Bhattacharya, I., Golestani, N., Yamashita, R., Kunder, C. A., Fan, R. E., Ghanouni, P., Brooks, J. D., et al. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108318 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Loeb, S., Carter, H. B., Berndt, S. I., Ricker, W., & Schaeffer, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1830-1834
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2057615180
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057
- The paper
- Loeb, S., Carter, H. B., Berndt, S. I., Ricker, W., & Schaeffer, E. M. (2011). Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.